JOET vs. PRN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JOET (Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF) and PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - JOET tracks the Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index while PRN tracks the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JOET returned 10.34%/yr vs 20.84%/yr for PRN. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JOET charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PRN.

Performance

JOET vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOET achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 45.08% return.

JOET

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: 3.07%
• YTD: 7.24%
• 6M: 5.58%
• 1Y: 13.87%
• 3Y*: 18.26%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: —

PRN

• 1D: -3.57%
• 1M: 6.97%
• YTD: 45.08%
• 6M: 39.29%
• 1Y: 65.87%
• 3Y*: 36.27%
• 5Y*: 20.84%
• 10Y*: 19.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOET vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF	7.24%	11.89%	24.01%	16.34%	-18.04%	26.79%	5.06%
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	45.08%	13.74%	30.35%	37.96%	-25.09%	25.21%	10.56%

Correlation

The correlation between JOET and PRN is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020	0.83

The correlation between JOET and PRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

JOET vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JOET	PRN
Technology	26.3%	20.4%
Industrials	21.8%	78.2%
Financial Services	14.3%	0.1%
Healthcare	11.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	1.2%
Energy	5.1%	1.6%
Communication Services	4.1%	-
Basic Materials	2.9%	1.8%
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	-
Utilities	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

JOET vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOET

JOET Risk / Return Rank: 29
JOET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
JOET Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
JOET Omega Ratio Rank: 27
JOET Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
JOET Martin Ratio Rank: 35

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 72
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOET vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JOET	PRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	2.18	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	2.72	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.35	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	4.68	-3.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.11	15.34	-10.23

JOET vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOET Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOET and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JOET vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOET drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOET and PRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	JOET	PRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.58%	-59.88%	+33.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.42%	-14.15%	+3.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.55%	-30.78%	+11.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.58%	-34.84%	+8.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-3.57%	+2.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.12%	-10.82%	+3.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	4.31%	-1.59%

Volatility

JOET vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) is 5.07%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that JOET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JOET	PRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	12.02%	-6.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.11%	24.35%	-13.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.05%	30.47%	-16.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.81%	25.41%	-7.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.55%	24.38%	-6.83%

JOET vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOET has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

JOET vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

JOET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than PRN's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF	0.61%	0.65%	0.71%	1.32%	1.25%	0.42%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	0.08%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JOET and PRN in my portfolio?

JOET and PRN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JOET or PRN?

PRN has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to JOET (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOET dropped -26.58% vs PRN's -59.88%.

Which ETF is better, JOET or PRN?

On 5-year performance, PRN leads with 20.84% vs 10.34% for JOET. On fees, JOET is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JOET has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JOET or PRN?

Over the 5-year period, PRN has performed better with a 20.84% return vs 10.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JOET or PRN?

JOET is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JOET or PRN?

JOET has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.08% for PRN.

What is the main difference between JOET and PRN?

JOET tracks Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JOET and 0.60% for PRN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.