PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JOET vs. PRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JOET vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOET achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 41.80% return.


JOET

1D
0.00%
1M
5.74%
YTD
7.43%
6M
6.85%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*

PRN

1D
0.59%
1M
6.86%
YTD
41.80%
6M
45.38%
1Y
65.12%
3Y*
36.96%
5Y*
20.18%
10Y*
18.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOET vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
7.43%11.89%24.01%16.34%-18.04%26.79%6.00%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
41.80%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between JOET and PRN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020

0.83

The correlation between JOET and PRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

JOET vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JOET
PRN

Technology

23.1%
19.4%

Industrials

22.6%
79.3%

Financial Services

15.1%
0.1%

Healthcare

11.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
1.2%

Energy

5.8%
1.6%

Communication Services

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.8%

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.6%

-

Utilities

0.8%

-

Technology

JOET
23.1%
PRN
19.4%

Industrials

JOET
22.6%
PRN
79.3%

Financial Services

JOET
15.1%
PRN
0.1%

Healthcare

JOET
11.1%
PRN

-

Consumer Cyclical

JOET
10.3%
PRN
1.2%

Energy

JOET
5.8%
PRN
1.6%

Communication Services

JOET
4.0%
PRN

-

Basic Materials

JOET
3.2%
PRN
1.8%

Real Estate

JOET
2.4%
PRN

-

Consumer Defensive

JOET
1.6%
PRN

-

Utilities

JOET
0.8%
PRN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JOET vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOET
JOET Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
JOET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOET Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
JOET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOET Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOET vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JOETPRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.37

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

4.63

-3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

15.45

-10.26

JOET vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOET Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOET and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JOETPRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.29

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.81

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.52

+0.19

Drawdowns

JOET vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOET drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOET and PRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JOETPRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-59.88%

+33.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-14.15%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.55%

-30.78%

+11.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-34.84%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.47%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-10.84%

+3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

4.23%

-1.52%

Volatility

JOET vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) is 3.50%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that JOET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JOETPRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

10.95%

-7.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

23.22%

-12.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

28.66%

-15.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.70%

25.03%

-7.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

24.17%

-6.65%

JOET vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOET has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

JOET vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

JOET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than PRN's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
0.61%0.65%0.71%1.32%1.25%0.42%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.11%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


JOET and PRN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to JOET (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOET dropped -26.58% vs PRN's -59.88%.

On 5-year performance, PRN leads with 20.18% vs 10.88% for JOET. On fees, JOET is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JOET has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PRN has performed better with a 20.18% return vs 10.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JOET is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

JOET has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.11% for PRN.

JOET tracks Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JOET and 0.60% for PRN.

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JOET and PRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer