PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PRN vs. IMCG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PRNIMCG
YTD Return46.59%22.20%
1Y Return67.69%39.37%
3Y Return (Ann)13.60%2.04%
5Y Return (Ann)21.38%14.11%
10Y Return (Ann)14.46%12.37%
Sharpe Ratio3.172.72
Sortino Ratio4.023.73
Omega Ratio1.521.47
Calmar Ratio5.011.60
Martin Ratio23.7414.44
Ulcer Index2.86%2.72%
Daily Std Dev21.38%14.45%
Max Drawdown-59.88%-58.96%
Current Drawdown-1.28%-0.56%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between PRN and IMCG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PRN vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 46.59% return, which is significantly higher than IMCG's 22.20% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 14.46%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.37% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
24.14%
12.74%
PRN
IMCG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PRN vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio.


PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
Expense ratio chart for PRN: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for IMCG: current value at 0.06% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.06%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRN vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PRN, currently valued at 3.17, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.17
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PRN, currently valued at 4.02, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PRN, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PRN, currently valued at 5.01, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PRN, currently valued at 23.74, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0023.74
IMCG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.72
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 3.73, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.73
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.60
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 14.44, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0014.44

PRN vs. IMCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is comparable to the IMCG Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and IMCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.17
2.72
PRN
IMCG

Dividends

PRN vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than IMCG's 0.77% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.30%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.41%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%0.35%0.35%
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.77%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%0.60%0.36%

Drawdowns

PRN vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, roughly equal to the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and IMCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.28%
-0.56%
PRN
IMCG

Volatility

PRN vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) at 4.44%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.86%
4.44%
PRN
IMCG