JNUG vs. AGQ
JNUG (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares) and AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - JNUG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (300%), while AGQ is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JNUG returned -23.85%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for AGQ. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JNUG charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AGQ.
Performance
JNUG vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNUG achieves a -13.94% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -27.00% return. Over the past 10 years, JNUG has underperformed AGQ with an annualized return of -23.85%, while AGQ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.
JNUG
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -13.94%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- 1Y
- 112.06%
- 3Y*
- 71.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- -23.85%
AGQ
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- YTD
- -27.00%
- 6M
- -1.58%
- 1Y
- 153.50%
- 3Y*
- 56.97%
- 5Y*
- 17.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
JNUG vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares | -13.94% | 478.59% | 9.96% | -4.79% | -43.60% | -46.61% | -85.51% | 82.43% | -48.11% | -20.18% |
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -27.00% | 360.71% | 23.92% | -15.09% | -7.89% | -32.25% | 62.02% | 20.02% | -22.10% | 5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNUG and AGQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013 | 0.72 |
The correlation between JNUG and AGQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNUG vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank
JNUG
AGQ
JNUG vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNUG | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 1.28 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 1.96 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.38 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.48 | 4.58 | +0.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNUG | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.28 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.23 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.22 | 0.18 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.29 | 0.08 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
JNUG vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNUG drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, roughly equal to the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUG and AGQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNUG | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.95% | -98.16% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.39% | -76.21% | +19.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.39% | -76.21% | +19.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.95% | -76.21% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.66% | -76.25% | -23.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.52% | -84.50% | -15.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.89% | -79.86% | -14.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.28% | 39.66% | -14.38% |
Volatility
JNUG vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) is 31.67%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 33.88%. This indicates that JNUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNUG | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.67% | 33.88% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.60% | 133.66% | -50.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 99.37% | 121.08% | -21.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.40% | 74.68% | +5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.52% | 65.65% | +40.87% |
JNUG vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNUG has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNUG vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares | 1.43% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 0.10% | 0.46% | 0.06% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNUG and AGQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGQ has higher volatility (33.88%) compared to JNUG (31.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNUG dropped -99.95% vs AGQ's -98.16%.
On 10-year performance, AGQ leads with 11.95% vs -23.85% for JNUG. On fees, AGQ is cheaper at 0.93% per year. On volatility, JNUG has been the lower-risk option at 31.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AGQ has performed better with a 11.95% return vs -23.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGQ is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for JNUG.
JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for AGQ.
JNUG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AGQ is Silver. JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (300%), while AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for JNUG and 0.93% for AGQ.
AGQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNUG and AGQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer