JNUG vs. NRGU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

JNUG (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - JNUG tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (300%) while NRGU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, JNUG returned 61.91% vs 107.84% for NRGU. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. JNUG charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

JNUG vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNUG achieves a -32.23% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 110.06% return.

JNUG

• 1D: 6.13%
• 1M: -37.63%
• YTD: -32.23%
• 6M: -30.59%
• 1Y: 61.91%
• 3Y*: 61.16%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: -26.31%

NRGU

• 1D: 2.51%
• 1M: 2.05%
• YTD: 110.06%
• 6M: 87.26%
• 1Y: 107.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNUG vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares	-32.23%	315.93%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	110.06%	-30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between JNUG and NRGU is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	-0.09

JNUG vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JNUG	NRGU
Basic Materials	100.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

JNUG vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNUG

JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 25
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 21

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 48
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 43
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNUG vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JNUG	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	1.44	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	1.98	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.24	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	2.71	-1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.26	6.55	-4.29

JNUG vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNUG and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JNUG vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNUG drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUG and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	JNUG	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.95%	-57.50%	-42.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.53%	-39.95%	-27.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.62%	-27.55%	-72.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-93.87%	-25.35%	-68.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.53%	16.54%	+10.99%

Volatility

JNUG vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) has a higher volatility of 39.22% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) at 27.12%. This indicates that JNUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JNUG	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.22%	27.12%	+12.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	88.34%	62.47%	+25.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.58%	75.30%	+27.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.23%	88.96%	-7.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	106.73%	88.96%	+17.77%

JNUG vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNUG has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

JNUG vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares	1.81%	1.04%	2.01%	1.62%	0.00%	0.52%	0.10%	0.46%	0.06%	0.51%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JNUG and NRGU in my portfolio?

JNUG and NRGU have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JNUG or NRGU?

JNUG has higher volatility (39.22%) compared to NRGU (27.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNUG dropped -99.95% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

Which ETF is better, JNUG or NRGU?

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 107.84% vs 61.91% for JNUG. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NRGU has been the lower-risk option at 27.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JNUG or NRGU?

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 107.84% return vs 61.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JNUG or NRGU?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for JNUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JNUG or NRGU?

JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between JNUG and NRGU?

JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (300%), while NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for JNUG and 0.95% for NRGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.