PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNSGX vs. JGLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNSGX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth (JNSGX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNSGX achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than JGLTX's 33.79% return. Over the past 10 years, JNSGX has underperformed JGLTX with an annualized return of 8.63%, while JGLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.75% annualized return.


JNSGX

1D
-0.69%
1M
3.89%
YTD
9.44%
6M
10.07%
1Y
22.05%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
8.63%

JGLTX

1D
-0.99%
1M
16.01%
YTD
33.79%
6M
33.57%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
36.57%
5Y*
19.20%
10Y*
24.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNSGX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNSGX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth
9.44%18.68%11.17%13.71%-17.82%10.38%14.54%19.94%-8.20%19.73%
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
33.79%25.19%32.10%54.55%-36.42%18.28%50.42%45.29%1.17%45.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JNSGX and JGLTX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.85

The correlation between JNSGX and JGLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNSGX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNSGX
JNSGX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
JNSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
JNSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

JGLTX
JGLTX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JGLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JGLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNSGX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth (JNSGX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNSGXJGLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.47

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.74

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.74

12.80

-1.06

JNSGX vs. JGLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the JGLTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNSGX and JGLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNSGXJGLTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.88

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.74

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

1.01

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.36

+0.09

Drawdowns

JNSGX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNSGX drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, smaller than the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNSGX and JGLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNSGXJGLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.39%

-81.78%

+31.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-15.81%

+7.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.70%

-23.72%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

-45.18%

+18.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.47%

-45.18%

+15.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-0.99%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-36.59%

+28.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

4.60%

-2.67%

Volatility

JNSGX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth (JNSGX) is 3.76%, while Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that JNSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNSGXJGLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

6.92%

-3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

16.88%

-7.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.90%

20.52%

-9.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.04%

26.09%

-13.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.23%

24.49%

-11.26%

JNSGX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNSGX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNSGX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison

JNSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, less than JGLTX's 6.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
6.71%8.98%0.00%0.00%26.96%14.48%7.71%6.81%4.95%5.68%3.71%16.11%
JNSGX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth
6.11%6.68%9.20%1.46%4.67%16.70%4.75%7.16%5.35%6.43%2.55%10.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNSGX and JGLTX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGLTX has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to JNSGX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNSGX dropped -50.39% vs JGLTX's -81.78%.

JGLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNSGX and JGLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer