JNSGX vs. WMRIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth (JNSGX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX).
JNSGX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 29, 2005. WMRIX is managed by Wilmington Funds. It was launched on Jun 30, 2003.
Performance
JNSGX vs. WMRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JNSGX vs. WMRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNSGX Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth | -2.50% | 18.68% | 11.17% | 13.71% | -17.82% | 10.38% | 14.54% | 19.94% | -8.20% | 19.73% |
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund | 10.96% | 12.79% | 2.57% | 1.12% | -8.03% | 21.49% | -2.19% | 16.85% | -7.21% | 11.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNSGX achieves a -2.50% return, which is significantly lower than WMRIX's 10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, JNSGX has outperformed WMRIX with an annualized return of 7.55%, while WMRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.50% annualized return.
JNSGX
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -2.50%
- 6M
- -0.57%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
WMRIX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 5.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNSGX vs. WMRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNSGX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than WMRIX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JNSGX vs. WMRIX — Risk / Return Rank
JNSGX
WMRIX
JNSGX vs. WMRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth (JNSGX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNSGX | WMRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.65 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 2.15 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.93 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.10 | 10.70 | -3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNSGX | WMRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.65 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.59 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.44 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.54 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between JNSGX and WMRIX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JNSGX vs. WMRIX - Dividend Comparison
JNSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than WMRIX's 6.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNSGX Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth | 6.85% | 6.68% | 9.20% | 1.46% | 4.67% | 16.70% | 4.75% | 7.16% | 5.35% | 6.43% | 2.55% | 10.31% |
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund | 6.45% | 7.15% | 1.02% | 3.51% | 6.07% | 9.29% | 1.99% | 3.03% | 2.84% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 5.31% |
Drawdowns
JNSGX vs. WMRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNSGX drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, which is greater than WMRIX's maximum drawdown of -37.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNSGX and WMRIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNSGX | WMRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.39% | -37.84% | -12.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.98% | -9.91% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.30% | -22.03% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.47% | -31.27% | +1.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.21% | -1.95% | -4.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.08% | -7.22% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.79% | +0.45% |
Volatility
JNSGX vs. WMRIX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth (JNSGX) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) at 2.85%. This indicates that JNSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JNSGX | WMRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 2.85% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.29% | 7.06% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 11.37% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 11.54% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.15% | 12.48% | +0.67% |