PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNSGX vs. JNGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth (JNSGX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNSGX achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than JNGTX's 22.64% return. Over the past 10 years, JNSGX has underperformed JNGTX with an annualized return of 8.35%, while JNGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.38% annualized return.


JNSGX

1D
0.83%
1M
0.00%
6M
6.77%
YTD
9.51%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
8.35%
ALL TIME*
6.54%

JNGTX

1D
1.15%
1M
-2.89%
6M
23.64%
YTD
22.64%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
31.46%
5Y*
14.56%
10Y*
22.38%
ALL TIME*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNSGX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth
9.51%18.68%11.17%13.71%-17.82%10.38%14.54%19.94%-8.20%19.73%
JNGTX
Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D
22.64%25.00%32.34%55.33%-37.63%17.53%51.18%45.15%0.92%44.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JNSGX and JNGTX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.85

The correlation between JNSGX and JNGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNSGX vs. JNGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JNSGX
JNSGX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JNSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
JNSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

JNGTX
JNGTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JNGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JNGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth (JNSGX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNSGXJNGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.22

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.74

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.25

5.67

+3.58

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the JNGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNSGX and JNGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNSGX drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, smaller than the maximum JNGTX drawdown of -84.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNSGX and JNGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNSGXJNGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.39%

-84.79%

+34.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-18.53%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.70%

-23.91%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

-46.46%

+20.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.47%

-46.46%

+16.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-9.85%

+8.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-40.02%

+32.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

5.68%

-3.64%

Volatility

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth (JNSGX) is 3.73%, while Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) has a volatility of 12.14%. This indicates that JNSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNSGXJNGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

12.14%

-8.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

23.66%

-13.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

27.05%

-14.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.25%

27.55%

-14.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.27%

25.12%

-11.85%

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNSGX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than JNGTX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Dividend Comparison

JNSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, less than JNGTX's 10.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNGTX
Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D
10.94%13.42%11.65%0.77%0.00%15.86%8.99%8.55%6.61%7.47%4.83%7.75%
JNSGX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth
6.10%6.68%9.20%1.46%4.67%16.70%4.75%7.16%5.35%6.43%2.55%10.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNSGX and JNGTX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNGTX has higher volatility (12.14%) compared to JNSGX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNSGX dropped -50.39% vs JNGTX's -84.79%.

JNSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNSGX and JNGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer