JNSGX vs. JNGTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JNSGX (Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth) and JNGTX (Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D) are both mutual funds - JNSGX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Janus Henderson, while JNGTX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Janus Henderson. Over the past 10 years, JNSGX returned 8.71%/yr vs 24.61%/yr for JNGTX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JNSGX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JNGTX.

Performance

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth (JNSGX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNSGX achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly lower than JNGTX's 35.21% return. Over the past 10 years, JNSGX has underperformed JNGTX with an annualized return of 8.71%, while JNGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.61% annualized return.

JNSGX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 5.51%
• YTD: 10.20%
• 6M: 11.06%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: 15.88%
• 5Y*: 6.75%
• 10Y*: 8.71%

JNGTX

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 18.05%
• YTD: 35.21%
• 6M: 35.37%
• 1Y: 60.36%
• 3Y*: 37.07%
• 5Y*: 19.30%
• 10Y*: 24.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JNSGX Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth	10.20%	18.68%	11.17%	13.71%	-17.82%	10.38%	14.54%	19.94%	-8.20%	19.73%
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D	35.21%	25.00%	32.34%	55.33%	-37.63%	17.53%	51.18%	45.15%	0.92%	44.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JNSGX and JNGTX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006	0.85

The correlation between JNSGX and JNGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JNSGX vs. JNGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNSGX

JNSGX Risk / Return Rank: 57
JNSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
JNSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
JNSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
JNSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
JNSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

JNGTX

JNGTX Risk / Return Rank: 79
JNGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
JNGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
JNGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
JNGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
JNGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth (JNSGX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JNSGX	JNGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	3.00	-0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	3.68	-0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.49	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	3.89	-1.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.38	13.33	-0.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the JNGTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNSGX and JNGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JNSGX	JNGTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	3.00	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.73	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	1.00	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.49	-0.04

Drawdowns

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNSGX drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, smaller than the maximum JNGTX drawdown of -84.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNSGX and JNGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JNSGX	JNGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.39%	-84.79%	+34.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.48%	-15.93%	+7.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.70%	-23.91%	+10.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.30%	-46.46%	+20.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.47%	-46.46%	+16.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.02%	-40.23%	+32.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	4.64%	-2.71%

Volatility

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth (JNSGX) is 3.68%, while Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that JNSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JNSGX	JNGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	6.74%	-3.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.96%	17.02%	-8.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.88%	20.67%	-9.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.04%	26.45%	-13.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.23%	24.59%	-11.36%

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNSGX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than JNGTX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

JNSGX vs. JNGTX - Dividend Comparison

JNSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, less than JNGTX's 9.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D	9.92%	13.42%	11.65%	0.77%	0.00%	15.86%	8.99%	8.55%	6.61%	7.47%	4.83%	7.75%
JNSGX Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Growth	6.06%	6.68%	9.20%	1.46%	4.67%	16.70%	4.75%	7.16%	5.35%	6.43%	2.55%	10.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JNSGX and JNGTX in my portfolio?

JNSGX and JNGTX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JNSGX or JNGTX?

JNGTX has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to JNSGX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNSGX dropped -50.39% vs JNGTX's -84.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JNGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.