JNK vs. VIS
JNK (State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JNK is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index, while VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JNK returned 5.09%/yr vs 14.22%/yr for VIS. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JNK charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VIS.
Performance
JNK vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 15.65% return. Over the past 10 years, JNK has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 5.09%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.22% annualized return.
JNK
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.09%
VIS
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
JNK vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | 1.83% | 8.76% | 7.71% | 12.42% | -12.19% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 14.88% | -3.28% | 6.49% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 15.65% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNK and VIS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between JNK and VIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
JNK vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JNK
VIS
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
JNK
VIS
Energy
JNK
VIS
Basic Materials
JNK
-
VIS
Communication Services
JNK
-
VIS
Consumer Cyclical
JNK
-
VIS
Consumer Defensive
JNK
-
VIS
-
Financial Services
JNK
-
VIS
Healthcare
JNK
-
VIS
Industrials
JNK
-
VIS
Real Estate
JNK
-
VIS
Utilities
JNK
-
VIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNK vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
JNK
VIS
JNK vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JNK | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.27 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 2.24 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 9.28 | +3.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JNK vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNK | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -63.51% | +25.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -12.29% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.02% | -20.80% | +15.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | -22.96% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.89% | -42.42% | +19.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.34% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -8.37% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 2.97% | -2.40% |
Volatility
JNK vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) is 1.21%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that JNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNK | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | 6.71% | -5.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 14.28% | -11.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 17.20% | -13.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 18.48% | -10.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 20.48% | -12.17% |
JNK vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNK vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than VIS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | 6.60% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNK and VIS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to JNK (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs VIS's -63.51%.
On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.22% vs 5.09% for JNK. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.
JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 0.88% for VIS.
JNK is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while VIS is Industrials Equities. JNK tracks Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.09% for VIS.
JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNK and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer