PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNK vs. VTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNK vs. VTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than VTC's 0.70% return.


JNK

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.14%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
5.05%

VTC

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.64%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.82%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNK vs. VTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNK
State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
1.83%8.76%7.71%12.42%-12.19%4.00%4.95%14.88%-3.28%0.82%
VTC
Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF
0.70%7.58%2.15%8.58%-15.68%-1.41%9.30%14.60%-2.55%0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between JNK and VTC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.48

Over the past year, JNK and VTC have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNK vs. VTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNK
JNK Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNK Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
JNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNK Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VTC
VTC Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTC Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNK vs. VTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNKVTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.21

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

1.81

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

5.63

+6.43

JNK vs. VTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the VTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNK and VTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNK vs. VTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than VTC's maximum drawdown of -22.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and VTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNKVTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-22.05%

-16.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-2.88%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-6.46%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-22.05%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.88%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-5.81%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.92%

-0.35%

Volatility

JNK vs. VTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) is 1.07%, while Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that JNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNKVTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

1.20%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.06%

3.32%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

4.34%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.56%

7.08%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.30%

7.67%

+0.63%

JNK vs. VTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VTC's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNK vs. VTC - Dividend Comparison

JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than VTC's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNK
State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
6.60%6.54%6.63%6.38%6.06%4.27%5.11%5.44%5.90%5.60%6.06%6.59%
VTC
Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF
4.92%4.76%4.50%3.80%3.13%2.36%2.69%3.34%3.53%0.55%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNK and VTC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTC has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to JNK (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs VTC's -22.05%.

On 5-year performance, JNK leads with 3.65% vs 0.35% for VTC. On fees, VTC is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JNK has performed better with a 3.65% return vs 0.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTC is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.

JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 4.92% for VTC.

JNK is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while VTC is Corporate Bonds. JNK tracks Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index, while VTC tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.03% for VTC.

JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNK and VTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer