JNJ vs. MS
JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) and MS (Morgan Stanley) are both stocks. JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while MS operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, JNJ returned 10.06%/yr vs 27.13%/yr for MS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JNJ vs. MS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly lower than MS's 20.86% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has underperformed MS with an annualized return of 10.06%, while MS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.13% annualized return.
JNJ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 16.43%
- 1Y
- 53.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
MS
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 21.34%
- 1Y
- 64.89%
- 3Y*
- 39.40%
- 5Y*
- 21.89%
- 10Y*
- 27.13%
JNJ vs. MS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 13.43% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
MS Morgan Stanley | 20.86% | 45.16% | 39.73% | 13.93% | -10.34% | 46.65% | 38.09% | 32.67% | -22.76% | 26.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNJ and MS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 1993 | 0.27 |
The correlation between JNJ and MS shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
JNJ:
$567.68B
MS:
$338.10B
JNJ:
$8.65
MS:
$11.41
JNJ:
26.85
MS:
18.59
JNJ:
0.89
MS:
1.75
JNJ:
5.86
MS:
2.81
JNJ:
6.99
MS:
3.23
JNJ:
$96.36B
MS:
$120.22B
JNJ:
$66.60B
MS:
$69.72B
JNJ:
$31.62B
MS:
$27.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNJ vs. MS — Risk / Return Rank
JNJ
MS
JNJ vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNJ | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.43 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 3.46 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 11.46 | +3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNJ | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 2.55 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.77 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.86 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.29 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
JNJ vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and MS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNJ | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.67% | -88.12% | +37.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.96% | -18.83% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | -29.24% | +13.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.41% | -32.38% | +13.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -51.33% | +23.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.06% | -2.76% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.88% | -33.70% | +21.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 5.68% | -1.98% |
Volatility
JNJ vs. MS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is 5.80%, while Morgan Stanley (MS) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that JNJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNJ | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 8.06% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 21.21% | -8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 25.62% | -8.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 28.72% | -11.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 31.51% | -13.04% |
Dividends
JNJ vs. MS - Dividend Comparison
JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than MS's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.26% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
MS Morgan Stanley | 1.88% | 2.17% | 2.82% | 3.49% | 3.47% | 2.14% | 2.04% | 2.54% | 2.77% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.73% |
Financials
JNJ vs. MS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Johnson & Johnson and Morgan Stanley. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JNJ vs. MS - Profitability Comparison
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
MS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 20.48B and revenue of 33.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
MS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 7.01B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
MS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 5.64B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
JNJ and MS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MS has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to JNJ (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNJ dropped -50.67% vs MS's -88.12%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNJ and MS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer