JMTG vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JMTG (JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMTG is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. JMTG is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. JMTG charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

JMTG vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMTG achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.31% return.

JMTG

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 0.77%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMTG vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JMTG JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.71%	3.94%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.31%	1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JMTG and RBIL is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

JMTG vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMTG vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMTG	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.18	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	6.39	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.06	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.59	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	44.07	—

Drawdowns

JMTG vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMTG and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMTG	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.78%	-0.52%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.54%	-0.51%	-1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.71%	-0.07%	-0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JMTG	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70%	0.95%	+2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.70%	1.07%	+2.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.70%	1.07%	+2.63%

JMTG vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMTG has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JMTG vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

JMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
JMTG JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	3.91%	2.10%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMTG and RBIL in my portfolio?

JMTG and RBIL have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JMTG or RBIL?

On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMTG or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JMTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMTG or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 3.91% for JMTG.

What is the main difference between JMTG and RBIL?

JMTG is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JMTG and 0.17% for RBIL.