PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMTG vs. GNMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JMTG vs. GNMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JMTG vs. GNMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
JMTG
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.60%3.90%
GNMA
iShares GNMA Bond ETF
0.45%3.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMTG achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than GNMA's 0.45% return.


JMTG

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
0.60%
6M
1.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GNMA

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
0.45%
6M
1.88%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
1.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JMTG vs. GNMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMTG has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than GNMA's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

JMTG vs. GNMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMTG

GNMA
GNMA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GNMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNMA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GNMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNMA Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMTG vs. GNMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JMTG vs. GNMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMTGGNMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

0.25

+1.40

Correlation

The correlation between JMTG and GNMA is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JMTG vs. GNMA - Dividend Comparison

JMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than GNMA's 4.21% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMTG
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
3.16%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GNMA
iShares GNMA Bond ETF
4.21%4.19%4.15%3.43%2.01%0.64%1.89%2.61%2.41%2.15%1.89%1.50%

Drawdowns

JMTG vs. GNMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, smaller than the maximum GNMA drawdown of -17.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMTG and GNMA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JMTGGNMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-17.09%

+14.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-1.52%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.46%

-3.69%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

Volatility

JMTG vs. GNMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JMTGGNMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

4.78%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.67%

6.56%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.67%

5.11%

-1.44%