PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GNMA vs. TFI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GNMATFI
YTD Return1.79%0.34%
1Y Return8.71%6.81%
3Y Return (Ann)-1.51%-1.49%
5Y Return (Ann)-0.52%0.38%
10Y Return (Ann)0.78%1.84%
Sharpe Ratio1.351.66
Sortino Ratio1.962.44
Omega Ratio1.241.33
Calmar Ratio0.620.63
Martin Ratio4.845.72
Ulcer Index1.84%1.26%
Daily Std Dev6.64%4.35%
Max Drawdown-17.09%-15.49%
Current Drawdown-6.73%-5.46%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GNMA and TFI is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GNMA vs. TFI - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GNMA achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than TFI's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GNMA has underperformed TFI with an annualized return of 0.78%, while TFI has yielded a comparatively higher 1.84% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.70%
1.58%
GNMA
TFI

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GNMA vs. TFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNMA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TFI's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


TFI
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for TFI: current value at 0.23% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.23%
Expense ratio chart for GNMA: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GNMA vs. TFI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNMA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GNMA, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GNMA, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GNMA, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GNMA, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.62
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GNMA, currently valued at 4.84, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.84
TFI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TFI, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TFI, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.44
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TFI, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TFI, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.63
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TFI, currently valued at 5.72, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.005.72

GNMA vs. TFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the TFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNMA and TFI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.35
1.66
GNMA
TFI

Dividends

GNMA vs. TFI - Dividend Comparison

GNMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than TFI's 2.94% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GNMA
iShares GNMA Bond ETF
4.05%3.43%2.01%0.64%1.89%2.62%2.41%2.14%1.89%1.50%1.22%1.06%
TFI
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF
2.94%2.41%1.87%1.71%2.04%2.14%2.25%2.16%2.39%2.40%2.37%3.35%

Drawdowns

GNMA vs. TFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNMA drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, which is greater than TFI's maximum drawdown of -15.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNMA and TFI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.73%
-5.46%
GNMA
TFI

Volatility

GNMA vs. TFI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) is 1.92%, while SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI) has a volatility of 2.15%. This indicates that GNMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.92%
2.15%
GNMA
TFI