PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GNMA vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GNMAVOO
YTD Return1.25%26.88%
1Y Return8.24%37.59%
3Y Return (Ann)-1.69%10.23%
5Y Return (Ann)-0.66%15.93%
10Y Return (Ann)0.73%13.41%
Sharpe Ratio1.223.06
Sortino Ratio1.794.08
Omega Ratio1.211.58
Calmar Ratio0.574.43
Martin Ratio4.3820.25
Ulcer Index1.86%1.85%
Daily Std Dev6.65%12.23%
Max Drawdown-17.09%-33.99%
Current Drawdown-7.22%-0.30%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.0-0.0

The correlation between GNMA and VOO is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

GNMA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GNMA achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 26.88% return. Over the past 10 years, GNMA has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 0.73%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.41% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.03%
13.46%
GNMA
VOO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GNMA vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNMA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


GNMA
iShares GNMA Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for GNMA: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GNMA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNMA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GNMA, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GNMA, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.79
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GNMA, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GNMA, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.57
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GNMA, currently valued at 4.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.38
VOO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VOO, currently valued at 3.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VOO, currently valued at 4.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VOO, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.58
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VOO, currently valued at 4.43, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VOO, currently valued at 20.25, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0020.25

GNMA vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNMA and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.22
3.06
GNMA
VOO

Dividends

GNMA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GNMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than VOO's 1.23% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GNMA
iShares GNMA Bond ETF
4.07%3.43%2.01%0.64%1.89%2.62%2.41%2.14%1.89%1.50%1.22%1.06%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.23%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%1.84%

Drawdowns

GNMA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNMA drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNMA and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.22%
-0.30%
GNMA
VOO

Volatility

GNMA vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) is 1.96%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that GNMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.96%
3.89%
GNMA
VOO