GNMA vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
GNMA and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GNMA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital GNMA Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 2012. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both GNMA and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GNMA or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between GNMA and VOO is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
GNMA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GNMA:
0.16
VOO:
2.22
GNMA:
0.26
VOO:
2.95
GNMA:
1.03
VOO:
1.42
GNMA:
0.08
VOO:
3.27
GNMA:
0.47
VOO:
14.57
GNMA:
2.14%
VOO:
1.90%
GNMA:
6.22%
VOO:
12.47%
GNMA:
-17.09%
VOO:
-33.99%
GNMA:
-7.66%
VOO:
-1.77%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNMA achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 26.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GNMA has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 0.65%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.
GNMA
0.77%
-0.62%
1.06%
1.01%
-0.74%
0.65%
VOO
26.92%
0.27%
10.43%
27.36%
14.95%
13.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GNMA vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GNMA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GNMA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GNMA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GNMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than VOO's 1.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNMA iShares GNMA Bond ETF | 4.16% | 3.43% | 2.01% | 0.64% | 1.89% | 2.62% | 2.41% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 1.50% | 1.22% | 1.06% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.23% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
GNMA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNMA drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNMA and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GNMA vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) is 1.93%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that GNMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.