PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMTG vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMTG vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JMTG

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.92%
6M
-0.08%
YTD
0.28%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.93%

BPH

1D
-3.01%
1M
12.73%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$43.80K$44.85K$49.89K
$24.75M$27.99M$36.83M

JMTG vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JMTG and BPH is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026

-0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMTG vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMTG
JMTG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JMTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMTG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
JMTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMTG Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMTG vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMTGBPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.56

JMTG vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMTG vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum BPH drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMTG and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMTGBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-15.58%

+12.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-3.26%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-6.01%

+5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

Volatility

JMTG vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMTGBPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

28.11%

-24.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.66%

28.11%

-24.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.66%

28.11%

-24.45%

JMTG vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMTG has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMTG vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

JMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than BPH's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BPH
BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF
0.50%0.00%
JMTG
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.33%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMTG and BPH have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JMTG.

JMTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.50% for BPH.

JMTG is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JMTG and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMTG and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer