JMTG vs. BPH
JMTG (JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMTG is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. Their -0.44 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. JMTG charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
JMTG vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JMTG
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.93%
BPH
- 1D
- -3.01%
- 1M
- 12.73%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.80K | $44.85K | $49.89K | |
| $24.75M | $27.99M | $36.83M |
JMTG vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JMTG JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.25% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMTG and BPH is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | -0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMTG vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank
JMTG
BPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JMTG vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMTG | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.56 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMTG vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum BPH drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMTG and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMTG | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -15.58% | +12.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -3.26% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -6.01% | +5.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | — | — |
Volatility
JMTG vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMTG | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 28.11% | -24.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 28.11% | -24.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 28.11% | -24.45% |
JMTG vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMTG has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JMTG vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
JMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than BPH's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.50% | 0.00% |
JMTG JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 4.33% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMTG and BPH have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JMTG.
JMTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.50% for BPH.
JMTG is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JMTG and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for JMTG and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer