PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMSI vs. VTEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMSI vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSI achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than VTEB's 1.46% return.


JMSI

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.41%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTEB

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.89%
1Y
7.14%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
2.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSI vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JMSI
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund
1.06%4.40%2.77%2.70%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
1.46%3.72%1.31%3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between JMSI and VTEB is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023

0.78

The correlation between JMSI and VTEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMSI vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSI
JMSI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JMSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VTEB
VTEB Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSI vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMSIVTEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.58

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.65

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.06

9.41

-2.34

JMSI vs. VTEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the VTEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSI and VTEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMSIVTEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.64

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.47

+0.55

Drawdowns

JMSI vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSI drawdown since its inception was -4.57%, smaller than the maximum VTEB drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSI and VTEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSIVTEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-17.00%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-2.71%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.52%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-2.33%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.76%

+0.10%

Volatility

JMSI vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison

J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB) at 0.89%. This indicates that JMSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMSIVTEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.89%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

2.01%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

2.72%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

3.90%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.73%

5.26%

-1.53%

JMSI vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMSI vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison

JMSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than VTEB's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMSI
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund
3.65%3.65%3.66%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.35%3.29%3.14%2.79%2.09%1.64%1.99%2.30%2.25%1.96%1.66%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMSI and VTEB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMSI has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to VTEB (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSI dropped -4.57% vs VTEB's -17.00%.

On 1-year performance, VTEB leads with 7.14% vs 6.08% for JMSI. On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VTEB has performed better with a 7.14% return vs 6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JMSI.

JMSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 3.35% for VTEB.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMSI and 0.03% for VTEB.

VTEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMSI and VTEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer