JMSI vs. TNGY
JMSI (J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund) and TNGY (Tortoise Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - JMSI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while TNGY is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Tortoise Capital. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. JMSI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TNGY.
Performance
JMSI vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMSI achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than TNGY's 15.21% return.
JMSI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNGY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMSI vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMSI J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund | 1.06% | 4.75% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 15.21% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMSI and TNGY is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMSI vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank
JMSI
TNGY
JMSI vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMSI | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMSI | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 1.15 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
JMSI vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMSI drawdown since its inception was -4.57%, smaller than the maximum TNGY drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSI and TNGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMSI | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.57% | -8.86% | +4.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -3.92% | +3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -2.18% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | — | — |
Volatility
JMSI vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMSI | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91% | 15.70% | -12.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 15.70% | -11.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 15.70% | -11.97% |
JMSI vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMSI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMSI vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison
JMSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than TNGY's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JMSI J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund | 3.65% | 3.65% | 3.66% | 1.79% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 3.41% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMSI and TNGY have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMSI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMSI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.
JMSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 3.41% for TNGY.
JMSI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TNGY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMSI and 0.85% for TNGY.
Find the right allocation for JMSI and TNGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer