PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMSI vs. MUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMSI vs. MUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSI achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than MUB's 1.24% return.


JMSI

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.41%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUB

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.74%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
2.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSI vs. MUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JMSI and MUB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023

0.81

The correlation between JMSI and MUB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMSI vs. MUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSI
JMSI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JMSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

MUB
MUB Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUB Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSI vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMSIMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.50

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.50

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.06

8.85

-1.78

JMSI vs. MUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSI and MUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMSIMUBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.39

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.58

+0.44

Drawdowns

JMSI vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSI drawdown since its inception was -4.57%, smaller than the maximum MUB drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSI and MUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSIMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-13.68%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-2.79%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.70%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-2.23%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.79%

+0.07%

Volatility

JMSI vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison

J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) have volatilities of 0.96% and 0.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMSIMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.97%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

2.22%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

2.92%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

4.06%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.73%

4.92%

-1.19%

JMSI vs. MUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than MUB's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMSI vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison

JMSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than MUB's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMSI
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund
3.65%3.65%3.66%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
3.17%3.14%3.01%2.65%2.11%1.81%2.11%2.42%2.46%2.26%2.21%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMSI and MUB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUB has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to JMSI (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSI dropped -4.57% vs MUB's -13.68%.

On 1-year performance, MUB leads with 6.95% vs 6.08% for JMSI. On fees, MUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUB has performed better with a 6.95% return vs 6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JMSI.

JMSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 3.17% for MUB.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMSI and 0.07% for MUB.

MUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMSI and MUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer