JMOM vs. USFR
JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - JMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMOM returned 15.85%/yr vs 3.70%/yr for USFR. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
JMOM vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 24.86% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.78% return.
JMOM
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 24.86%
- 6M
- 23.18%
- 1Y
- 39.01%
- 3Y*
- 28.48%
- 5Y*
- 15.85%
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
JMOM vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 24.86% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.36% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.78% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMOM and USFR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | -0.01 |
The correlation between JMOM and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMOM vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
JMOM
USFR
JMOM vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMOM | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -46.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 13.24 | -11.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.98 | 200.29 | -195.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.49 | 775.73 | -753.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMOM vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMOM | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -1.36% | -32.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -0.02% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -0.06% | -19.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -0.18% | -28.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -0.15% | -6.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 0.01% | +1.73% |
Volatility
JMOM vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.08%. This indicates that JMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMOM | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.69% | 0.08% | +6.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.85% | 0.19% | +12.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.49% | 0.27% | +15.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 0.40% | +18.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 0.78% | +19.40% |
JMOM vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JMOM vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMOM and USFR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMOM has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to USFR (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 15.85% vs 3.70% for USFR. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 15.85% return vs 3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USFR.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.70% for JMOM.
JMOM is categorized as Momentum, while USFR is Government Bonds. JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMOM and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer