JMOM vs. PTF
JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index while PTF tracks the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMOM returned 16.28%/yr vs 23.79%/yr for PTF. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTF.
Performance
JMOM vs. PTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 22.79% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 77.58% return.
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 22.79%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 36.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- —
PTF
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 19.05%
- YTD
- 77.58%
- 6M
- 74.93%
- 1Y
- 109.08%
- 3Y*
- 43.28%
- 5Y*
- 23.79%
- 10Y*
- 26.93%
JMOM vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.79% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 77.58% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | -1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMOM and PTF is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.81 |
The correlation between JMOM and PTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
JMOM vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMOM
PTF
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
JMOM
PTF
Industrials
JMOM
PTF
Financial Services
JMOM
PTF
Healthcare
JMOM
PTF
-
Communication Services
JMOM
PTF
Consumer Cyclical
JMOM
PTF
-
Consumer Defensive
JMOM
PTF
-
Energy
JMOM
PTF
Real Estate
JMOM
PTF
-
Utilities
JMOM
PTF
-
Basic Materials
JMOM
PTF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMOM vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank
JMOM
PTF
JMOM vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMOM | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.44 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 6.10 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.24 | 24.27 | -2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMOM | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.86 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.68 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.54 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
JMOM vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and PTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMOM | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -55.38% | +21.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -17.99% | +10.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -36.11% | +16.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -44.88% | +16.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -13.27% | +6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 4.51% | -2.85% |
Volatility
JMOM vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) is 4.62%, while Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 13.27%. This indicates that JMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMOM | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 13.27% | -8.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 29.47% | -17.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 38.39% | -24.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 34.95% | -16.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 32.94% | -12.81% |
JMOM vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMOM vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison
JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMOM and PTF have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to JMOM (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs PTF's -55.38%.
On 5-year performance, PTF leads with 23.79% vs 16.28% for JMOM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTF has performed better with a 23.79% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.
JMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.60% for PTF.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMOM and PTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer