JMOM vs. LVDS
JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while LVDS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan. JMOM is passively managed, while LVDS is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LVDS.
Performance
JMOM vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 21.80% return, which is significantly higher than LVDS's 15.33% return.
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 21.80%
- 6M
- 19.67%
- 1Y
- 32.36%
- 3Y*
- 27.42%
- 5Y*
- 15.02%
- 10Y*
- —
LVDS
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 21.80% | 7.44% |
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 15.33% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMOM and LVDS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.76 |
JMOM vs. LVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMOM
LVDS
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
JMOM
LVDS
Industrials
JMOM
LVDS
Financial Services
JMOM
LVDS
Healthcare
JMOM
LVDS
Communication Services
JMOM
LVDS
Consumer Cyclical
JMOM
LVDS
Consumer Defensive
JMOM
LVDS
Energy
JMOM
LVDS
Real Estate
JMOM
LVDS
Utilities
JMOM
LVDS
Basic Materials
JMOM
LVDS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMOM vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank
JMOM
LVDS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JMOM vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMOM | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.51 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMOM vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and LVDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMOM | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -6.64% | -27.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -1.07% | -1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -0.95% | -5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | — | — |
Volatility
JMOM vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMOM | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 10.62% | +5.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 10.62% | +8.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 10.62% | +9.57% |
JMOM vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMOM vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison
JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than LVDS's 7.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.74% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 7.80% | 8.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMOM and LVDS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LVDS.
LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.80%, compared with 0.74% for JMOM.
JMOM is categorized as Momentum, while LVDS is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.30% for LVDS.
Find the right allocation for JMOM and LVDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer