JMMF vs. FXZ
JMMF (JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF) and FXZ (First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - JMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while FXZ is a Materials fund tracking the StrataQuant Materials Index. JMMF is actively managed, while FXZ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. JMMF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FXZ.
Performance
JMMF vs. FXZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMMF achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than FXZ's 24.42% return.
JMMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXZ
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 24.42%
- 6M
- 22.36%
- 1Y
- 44.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
JMMF vs. FXZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.63% | 0.17% |
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 24.42% | 1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMMF and FXZ is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMMF vs. FXZ — Risk / Return Rank
JMMF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FXZ
JMMF vs. FXZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF) and First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMMF | FXZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMMF vs. FXZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.14%, smaller than the maximum FXZ drawdown of -65.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMMF and FXZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMMF | FXZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -65.46% | +65.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.23% | +5.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -11.33% | +11.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.44% | — |
Volatility
JMMF vs. FXZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMMF | FXZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51% | 22.77% | -22.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 24.19% | -23.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 24.93% | -24.42% |
JMMF vs. FXZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMMF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FXZ's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMMF vs. FXZ - Dividend Comparison
JMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than FXZ's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 1.44% | 1.74% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 1.56% | 1.11% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.26% |
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.80% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMMF and FXZ have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMMF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMMF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for FXZ.
JMMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.44% for FXZ.
JMMF is categorized as Money Market, while FXZ is Materials. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for JMMF and 0.67% for FXZ.
Find the right allocation for JMMF and FXZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer