JMHI vs. LNGX
JMHI (JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF) and LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMHI is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. JMHI is actively managed, while LNGX is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. JMHI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LNGX.
Performance
JMHI vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMHI achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than LNGX's 19.55% return.
JMHI
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 6.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LNGX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -6.07%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMHI vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMHI JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF | 1.56% | 0.02% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 19.55% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMHI and LNGX is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMHI vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank
JMHI
LNGX
JMHI vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMHI | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMHI | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 2.03 | -0.98 |
Drawdowns
JMHI vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMHI drawdown since its inception was -7.11%, smaller than the maximum LNGX drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMHI and LNGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMHI | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.11% | -14.31% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -12.03% | +11.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -4.32% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | — | — |
Volatility
JMHI vs. LNGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMHI | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24% | 24.75% | -21.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 24.75% | -20.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 24.75% | -20.25% |
JMHI vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMHI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMHI vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison
JMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than LNGX's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JMHI JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF | 4.54% | 4.42% | 4.49% | 2.48% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMHI and LNGX have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMHI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMHI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.
JMHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.
JMHI is categorized as High Yield Muni, while LNGX is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JMHI and 0.45% for LNGX.
Find the right allocation for JMHI and LNGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer