PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLQD vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JLQD vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JLQD vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JLQD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
-0.67%7.77%3.21%8.76%-15.99%-1.25%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
-0.31%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLQD achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than VCIT's -0.31% return.


JLQD

1D
0.69%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
0.31%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
10Y*

VCIT

1D
0.14%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
-0.31%
6M
0.49%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
3.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JLQD vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLQD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

JLQD vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLQD
JLQD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
JLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
JLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLQD vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLQDVCITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

1.24

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

1.73

-0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

2.08

-0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.45

7.27

-2.82

JLQD vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLQD Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the VCIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLQD and VCIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLQDVCITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.24

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.76

-0.77

Correlation

The correlation between JLQD and VCIT is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JLQD vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

JLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than VCIT's 4.76% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLQD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
5.38%5.28%5.36%3.99%2.77%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.76%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Drawdowns

JLQD vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLQD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, roughly equal to the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLQD and VCIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JLQDVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.17%

-20.56%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.57%

-2.99%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-1.84%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-3.18%

-5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.86%

+0.19%

Volatility

JLQD vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) is 1.97%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a volatility of 2.08%. This indicates that JLQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JLQDVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

2.08%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.56%

2.84%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.03%

4.85%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

6.60%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.39%

6.27%

+0.12%