JLQD vs. BSCQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JLQD (Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - JLQD tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index while BSCQ tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JLQD returned 5.54%/yr vs 5.06%/yr for BSCQ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JLQD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.

Performance

JLQD vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLQD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.55% return.

JLQD

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 0.13%
• 1Y: 6.25%
• 3Y*: 5.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSCQ

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: 5.06%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLQD vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF	0.24%	7.77%	3.21%	8.76%	-15.99%	-1.25%
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	1.55%	5.02%	4.86%	5.71%	-8.31%	-1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JLQD and BSCQ is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between JLQD and BSCQ has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JLQD vs. BSCQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JLQD	BSCQ
Financial Services	2.8%	32.7%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Communication Services	-	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.9%
Energy	-	3.0%
Healthcare	-	7.4%
Industrials	-	6.0%
Real Estate	-	2.9%
Technology	-	10.8%
Utilities	-	3.5%

Return for Risk

JLQD vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLQD

JLQD Risk / Return Rank: 47
JLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
JLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
JLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 47
JLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
JLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 47

BSCQ

BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLQD vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JLQD	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	7.06	-5.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	15.22	-12.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	3.45	-2.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	43.24	-41.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.63	179.65	-172.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JLQD vs. BSCQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLQD Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the BSCQ Sharpe Ratio of 7.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLQD and BSCQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JLQD	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	7.06	-5.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.60	-0.58

Drawdowns

JLQD vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLQD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLQD and BSCQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLQD	BSCQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.17%	-16.50%	-4.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.87%	-0.10%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.84%	-1.13%	-5.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	0.00%	-0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	-2.85%	-5.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	0.02%	+0.80%

Volatility

JLQD vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.17%. This indicates that JLQD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLQD	BSCQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	0.17%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.78%	0.43%	+2.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.88%	0.63%	+3.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.32%	3.30%	+3.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.32%	4.77%	+1.55%

JLQD vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLQD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JLQD vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

JLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than BSCQ's 4.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.12%	4.14%	4.05%	3.53%	2.54%	1.91%	2.42%	2.96%	3.32%	2.92%	0.51%
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF	5.44%	5.28%	5.36%	3.99%	2.77%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLQD and BSCQ in my portfolio?

JLQD and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JLQD or BSCQ?

JLQD has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to BSCQ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLQD dropped -21.17% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.

Which ETF is better, JLQD or BSCQ?

On 3-year performance, JLQD leads with 5.54% vs 5.06% for BSCQ. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JLQD or BSCQ?

Over the 3-year period, JLQD has performed better with a 5.54% return vs 5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JLQD or BSCQ?

BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JLQD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JLQD or BSCQ?

JLQD has the higher dividend yield at 5.44%, compared with 4.12% for BSCQ.

What is the main difference between JLQD and BSCQ?

JLQD tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index, while BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JLQD and 0.10% for BSCQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.06 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.