JLQD vs. JSML
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML).
JLQD and JSML are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JLQD is a passively managed fund by Janus Henderson that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 8, 2021. JSML is a passively managed fund by Janus Henderson that tracks the performance of the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2016. Both JLQD and JSML are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
JLQD vs. JSML - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JLQD vs. JSML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | -0.67% | 7.77% | 3.21% | 8.76% | -15.99% | -1.25% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | -4.74% | 13.41% | 12.45% | 30.09% | -29.40% | -5.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JLQD achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly higher than JSML's -4.74% return.
JLQD
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JSML
- 1D
- 4.25%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -4.74%
- 6M
- -6.13%
- 1Y
- 15.83%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JLQD vs. JSML - Expense Ratio Comparison
JLQD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JSML's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JLQD vs. JSML — Risk / Return Rank
JLQD
JSML
JLQD vs. JSML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JLQD | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.66 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 1.09 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.14 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 4.44 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JLQD | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.66 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.47 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between JLQD and JSML is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JLQD vs. JSML - Dividend Comparison
JLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than JSML's 0.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | 5.82% | 5.28% | 5.36% | 3.99% | 2.77% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.66% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.52% |
Drawdowns
JLQD vs. JSML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JLQD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, smaller than the maximum JSML drawdown of -39.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLQD and JSML.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JLQD | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.17% | -39.65% | +18.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.57% | -14.84% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -11.22% | +9.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -11.02% | +1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 4.32% | -3.27% |
Volatility
JLQD vs. JSML - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) is 1.97%, while Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a volatility of 9.14%. This indicates that JLQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JLQD | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 9.14% | -7.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.56% | 16.36% | -13.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.03% | 24.08% | -19.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 24.19% | -17.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 24.16% | -17.77% |