PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLKYX vs. TLXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JLKYX vs. TLXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JLKYX vs. TLXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
-0.42%20.04%15.41%18.53%-18.04%18.38%16.13%25.07%-8.32%17.29%
TLXIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund
-0.75%20.13%14.63%20.06%-17.26%16.63%17.02%25.84%-6.96%18.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLKYX achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly higher than TLXIX's -0.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JLKYX having a 10.44% annualized return and TLXIX not far ahead at 10.82%.


JLKYX

1D
0.96%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
-0.42%
6M
1.82%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
15.62%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
10.44%

TLXIX

1D
0.91%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
1.39%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
10.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JLKYX vs. TLXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLKYX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than TLXIX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

JLKYX vs. TLXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKYX
JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TLXIX
TLXIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TLXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TLXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLKYX vs. TLXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLKYXTLXIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

1.91

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.90

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.40

8.66

-0.25

JLKYX vs. TLXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLKYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the TLXIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKYX and TLXIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLKYXTLXIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.61

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.72

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.71

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between JLKYX and TLXIX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JLKYX vs. TLXIX - Dividend Comparison

JLKYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than TLXIX's 3.26% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
3.62%3.61%1.77%2.16%8.08%5.71%3.88%8.54%10.69%4.33%3.23%1.75%
TLXIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund
3.26%3.24%2.33%2.07%2.49%2.51%1.77%2.25%2.69%0.16%2.59%2.47%

Drawdowns

JLKYX vs. TLXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKYX drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, roughly equal to the maximum TLXIX drawdown of -31.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKYX and TLXIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JLKYXTLXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-31.08%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-8.45%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.75%

-24.97%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.55%

-31.08%

-1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.73%

-5.29%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-4.06%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.27%

+0.24%

Volatility

JLKYX vs. TLXIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX) at 5.26%. This indicates that JLKYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JLKYXTLXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

5.26%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

8.56%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.42%

14.69%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

13.90%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

15.11%

+1.05%