PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLKOX vs. PPLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLKOX vs. PPLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) and Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLKOX achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly higher than PPLIX's 8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, JLKOX has underperformed PPLIX with an annualized return of 10.73%, while PPLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.


JLKOX

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.92%
YTD
12.66%
6M
7.43%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.73%

PPLIX

1D
-0.86%
1M
2.83%
YTD
8.51%
6M
8.86%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
11.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLKOX vs. PPLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLKOX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio
12.66%12.30%15.50%18.67%-19.67%15.80%20.38%24.75%-8.96%18.37%
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
8.51%17.55%19.12%20.36%-18.78%17.04%16.56%26.67%-8.74%22.12%

Correlation

The correlation between JLKOX and PPLIX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2011

0.96

The correlation between JLKOX and PPLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (1 year) to 0.96 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLKOX vs. PPLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKOX
JLKOX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JLKOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

PPLIX
PPLIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PPLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLKOX vs. PPLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) and Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLKOXPPLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.51

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

11.27

-2.72

JLKOX vs. PPLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLKOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the PPLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKOX and PPLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLKOXPPLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.85

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.74

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.45

+0.12

Drawdowns

JLKOX vs. PPLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKOX drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum PPLIX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKOX and PPLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLKOXPPLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-55.61%

+23.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-8.57%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

-15.59%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-26.85%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

-32.67%

+0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.86%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-8.30%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

1.90%

+0.74%

Volatility

JLKOX vs. PPLIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) at 3.39%. This indicates that JLKOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLKOXPPLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

3.39%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

9.25%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

11.60%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

15.47%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

15.59%

+0.94%

JLKOX vs. PPLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLKOX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PPLIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JLKOX vs. PPLIX - Dividend Comparison

JLKOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than PPLIX's 9.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLKOX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio
1.68%1.89%3.22%3.22%18.51%9.85%4.79%9.55%12.92%4.02%6.43%5.53%
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
9.17%9.95%11.56%4.41%9.40%8.04%5.23%7.16%8.64%5.12%4.82%6.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLKOX and PPLIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLKOX has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to PPLIX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLKOX dropped -32.04% vs PPLIX's -55.61%.

PPLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLKOX and PPLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer