PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLKOX vs. JVLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLKOX vs. JVLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLKOX achieves a 13.25% return, which is significantly lower than JVLIX's 18.45% return. Over the past 10 years, JLKOX has underperformed JVLIX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while JVLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.


JLKOX

1D
1.38%
1M
2.59%
YTD
13.25%
6M
7.04%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
10.87%

JVLIX

1D
0.69%
1M
5.59%
YTD
18.45%
6M
17.07%
1Y
33.56%
3Y*
21.92%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLKOX vs. JVLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLKOX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio
13.25%12.30%15.50%18.67%-19.67%15.80%20.38%24.75%-8.96%18.37%
JVLIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund
18.45%17.48%15.59%13.91%-4.45%29.92%1.59%22.70%-9.75%17.97%

Correlation

The correlation between JLKOX and JVLIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2011

0.88

The correlation between JLKOX and JVLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (3 years) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLKOX vs. JVLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKOX
JLKOX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JLKOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

JVLIX
JVLIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
JVLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
JVLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLKOX vs. JVLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLKOXJVLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.47

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

4.32

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

18.13

-9.67

JLKOX vs. JVLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLKOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the JVLIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKOX and JVLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JLKOX vs. JVLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKOX drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum JVLIX drawdown of -59.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKOX and JVLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLKOXJVLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-59.12%

+27.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-7.95%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

-20.48%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-20.48%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

-40.33%

+8.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.07%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-10.50%

+5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.89%

+0.80%

Volatility

JLKOX vs. JVLIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX) at 4.95%. This indicates that JLKOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JVLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLKOXJVLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

4.95%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.76%

10.41%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

12.96%

+2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.41%

17.37%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

18.95%

-2.36%

JLKOX vs. JVLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLKOX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JVLIX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLKOX vs. JVLIX - Dividend Comparison

JLKOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than JVLIX's 5.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLKOX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio
1.67%1.89%3.22%3.22%18.51%9.85%4.79%9.55%12.92%4.02%6.43%5.53%
JVLIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund
5.60%6.64%13.97%7.22%7.16%14.63%1.57%5.87%10.59%4.60%1.22%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLKOX and JVLIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLKOX has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to JVLIX (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLKOX dropped -32.04% vs JVLIX's -59.12%.

JVLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLKOX and JVLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer