PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLKOX vs. JCCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLKOX vs. JCCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) and John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLKOX achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly lower than JCCIX's 17.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JLKOX having a 10.73% annualized return and JCCIX not far behind at 10.33%.


JLKOX

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.92%
YTD
12.66%
6M
7.43%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.73%

JCCIX

1D
-0.99%
1M
4.33%
YTD
17.92%
6M
17.67%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
12.29%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLKOX vs. JCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLKOX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio
12.66%12.30%15.50%18.67%-19.67%15.80%20.38%24.75%-8.96%18.37%
JCCIX
John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund
17.92%-1.90%10.62%16.52%-19.09%24.10%25.99%26.79%-18.28%16.04%

Correlation

The correlation between JLKOX and JCCIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2013

0.84

The correlation between JLKOX and JCCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLKOX vs. JCCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKOX
JLKOX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JLKOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

JCCIX
JCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
JCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLKOX vs. JCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) and John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLKOXJCCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.56

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

8.13

+0.42

JLKOX vs. JCCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLKOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the JCCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKOX and JCCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLKOXJCCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.45

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.20

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.48

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.43

+0.14

Drawdowns

JLKOX vs. JCCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKOX drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum JCCIX drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKOX and JCCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLKOXJCCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-38.69%

+6.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-10.42%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

-27.47%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-27.47%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

-38.69%

+6.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-1.09%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-7.61%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

3.27%

-0.63%

Volatility

JLKOX vs. JCCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) is 3.99%, while John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that JLKOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLKOXJCCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

5.16%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

12.87%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

18.47%

-4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

21.61%

-5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

21.48%

-4.95%

JLKOX vs. JCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLKOX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JCCIX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLKOX vs. JCCIX - Dividend Comparison

JLKOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than JCCIX's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JCCIX
John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund
3.84%4.53%0.96%0.83%0.99%12.20%1.43%0.00%5.55%11.90%0.73%1.07%
JLKOX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio
1.68%1.89%3.22%3.22%18.51%9.85%4.79%9.55%12.92%4.02%6.43%5.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLKOX and JCCIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JCCIX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to JLKOX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLKOX dropped -32.04% vs JCCIX's -38.69%.

JLKOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLKOX and JCCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer