PortfoliosLab logo
JLKOX vs. JLKUX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between JLKOX and JLKUX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

JLKOX vs. JLKUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) and John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

JLKOX:

0.57

JLKUX:

0.57

Sortino Ratio

JLKOX:

0.79

JLKUX:

0.79

Omega Ratio

JLKOX:

1.11

JLKUX:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

JLKOX:

0.32

JLKUX:

0.35

Martin Ratio

JLKOX:

1.93

JLKUX:

1.93

Ulcer Index

JLKOX:

4.37%

JLKUX:

4.37%

Daily Std Dev

JLKOX:

17.32%

JLKUX:

17.33%

Max Drawdown

JLKOX:

-37.58%

JLKUX:

-35.72%

Current Drawdown

JLKOX:

-12.53%

JLKUX:

-9.97%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JLKOX having a 3.80% return and JLKUX slightly lower at 3.75%. Over the past 10 years, JLKOX has underperformed JLKUX with an annualized return of 2.50%, while JLKUX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.51% annualized return.


JLKOX

YTD

3.80%

1M

5.24%

6M

-1.15%

1Y

9.16%

3Y*

3.50%

5Y*

5.33%

10Y*

2.50%

JLKUX

YTD

3.75%

1M

5.24%

6M

-1.15%

1Y

9.15%

3Y*

4.52%

5Y*

6.04%

10Y*

3.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JLKOX vs. JLKUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JLKOX and JLKUX have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

JLKOX vs. JLKUX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKOX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JLKOX is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JLKOX is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JLKOX is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JLKOX is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JLKOX is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JLKOX is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

JLKUX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JLKUX is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JLKUX is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JLKUX is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JLKUX is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JLKUX is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JLKUX is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

JLKOX vs. JLKUX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) and John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current JLKOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the JLKUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKOX and JLKUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

JLKOX vs. JLKUX - Dividend Comparison

JLKOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, which matches JLKUX's 3.12% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
JLKOX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio
3.10%3.21%3.22%18.51%9.84%4.78%9.55%12.93%6.67%6.43%5.54%4.86%
JLKUX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
3.12%3.23%3.28%15.01%9.93%4.35%8.74%11.46%5.96%4.83%2.96%2.26%

Drawdowns

JLKOX vs. JLKUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKOX drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, which is greater than JLKUX's maximum drawdown of -35.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKOX and JLKUX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

JLKOX vs. JLKUX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) and John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX) have volatilities of 3.72% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...