PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLKOX vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JLKOX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JLKOX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLKOX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio
-4.61%12.30%15.50%18.67%-19.67%15.80%20.38%24.75%-8.96%18.37%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
-1.71%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLKOX achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly lower than VT's -1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, JLKOX has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 9.16%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.


JLKOX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-9.32%
YTD
-4.61%
6M
-7.26%
1Y
8.88%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*
9.16%

VT

1D
3.08%
1M
-6.22%
YTD
-1.71%
6M
1.42%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JLKOX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLKOX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

JLKOX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKOX
JLKOX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
JLKOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLKOX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLKOXVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

1.25

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

1.84

-1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.27

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

1.83

-1.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.66

8.51

-7.85

JLKOX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLKOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKOX and VT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLKOXVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.25

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.58

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.67

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.40

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between JLKOX and VT is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JLKOX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

JLKOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than VT's 1.82% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLKOX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio
1.98%1.89%3.22%3.22%18.51%9.85%4.79%9.55%12.92%4.02%6.43%5.53%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.82%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Drawdowns

JLKOX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKOX drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKOX and VT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JLKOXVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-50.27%

+18.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-11.84%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-26.38%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

-34.24%

+2.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.45%

-6.89%

-3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-7.08%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

2.55%

+1.93%

Volatility

JLKOX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKOX) is 5.36%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that JLKOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JLKOXVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

6.33%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

9.95%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.94%

17.24%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

15.98%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

17.20%

-0.76%