JCCIX vs. VB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JCCIX (John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, JCCIX returned 10.86%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for VB. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JCCIX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.

Performance

JCCIX vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCCIX achieves a 22.57% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 15.68% return. Over the past 10 years, JCCIX has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 10.86%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.

JCCIX

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: 5.27%
• YTD: 22.57%
• 6M: 19.96%
• 1Y: 32.59%
• 3Y*: 12.60%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 10.86%

VB

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.83%
• YTD: 15.68%
• 6M: 13.00%
• 1Y: 30.17%
• 3Y*: 17.54%
• 5Y*: 7.39%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCCIX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JCCIX John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund	22.57%	-1.90%	10.62%	16.52%	-19.09%	24.10%	25.99%	26.79%	-18.28%	16.04%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	15.68%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	27.34%	-9.34%	16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between JCCIX and VB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2013	0.96

The correlation between JCCIX and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JCCIX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCCIX

JCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 48
JCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
JCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
JCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
JCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
JCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 60
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 52
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCCIX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JCCIX	VB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.82	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.59	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	3.38	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.01	12.38	-2.37

JCCIX vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCCIX and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JCCIX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCCIX drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCCIX and VB.

Drawdown Indicators

	JCCIX	VB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.69%	-59.56%	+20.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.42%	-8.98%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.47%	-25.36%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.47%	-28.15%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.69%	-42.05%	+3.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.39%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-8.42%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	2.44%	+0.81%

Volatility

JCCIX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.92%. This indicates that JCCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JCCIX	VB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.40%	4.92%	+1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.45%	12.21%	+1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.87%	16.66%	+2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.69%	20.78%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.53%	21.45%	+0.08%

JCCIX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCCIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

JCCIX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

JCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JCCIX John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund	3.70%	4.53%	0.96%	0.83%	0.99%	12.20%	1.43%	0.00%	5.55%	11.90%	0.73%	1.07%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.18%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JCCIX and VB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, JCCIX and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JCCIX or VB?

JCCIX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to VB (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCCIX dropped -38.69% vs VB's -59.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.