PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLIAX vs. LTRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLIAX vs. LTRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) and Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLIAX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than LTRIX's 8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, JLIAX has underperformed LTRIX with an annualized return of 10.29%, while LTRIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.


JLIAX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.69%
YTD
11.32%
6M
12.09%
1Y
24.82%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
10.29%

LTRIX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.28%
YTD
8.73%
6M
9.08%
1Y
21.03%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
11.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLIAX vs. LTRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLIAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
11.32%17.06%12.87%16.80%-19.86%14.83%19.46%23.96%-9.08%18.19%
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
8.73%16.69%16.90%19.40%-18.51%16.55%16.33%25.81%-8.34%21.38%

Correlation

The correlation between JLIAX and LTRIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2008

0.98

The correlation between JLIAX and LTRIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLIAX vs. LTRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLIAX
JLIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JLIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JLIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

LTRIX
LTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLIAX vs. LTRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) and Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLIAXLTRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.37

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.68

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

12.01

+0.99

JLIAX vs. LTRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the LTRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLIAX and LTRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLIAXLTRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.01

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.60

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.75

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.48

-0.07

Drawdowns

JLIAX vs. LTRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLIAX drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, which is greater than LTRIX's maximum drawdown of -51.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLIAX and LTRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLIAXLTRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.47%

-51.39%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-8.04%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.42%

-14.47%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-26.25%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.05%

-31.56%

+0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-7.20%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.79%

+0.14%

Volatility

JLIAX vs. LTRIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) at 3.06%. This indicates that JLIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLIAXLTRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.06%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

8.62%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

10.73%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

14.59%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.15%

14.82%

+0.33%

JLIAX vs. LTRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLIAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than LTRIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLIAX vs. LTRIX - Dividend Comparison

JLIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, less than LTRIX's 8.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLIAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
8.24%9.18%2.86%2.82%22.31%9.18%5.58%11.19%13.74%6.10%6.95%6.25%
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
8.56%9.31%9.40%4.25%8.71%6.75%4.62%6.93%7.50%4.57%4.48%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, JLIAX and LTRIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JLIAX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to LTRIX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLIAX dropped -56.47% vs LTRIX's -51.39%.

JLIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLIAX and LTRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer