PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLIAX vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLIAX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JLIAX having a 10.96% return and VTI slightly higher at 11.20%. Over the past 10 years, JLIAX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 10.25%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.


JLIAX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.10%
YTD
10.96%
6M
12.19%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
10.25%

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLIAX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLIAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
10.96%17.06%12.87%16.80%-19.86%14.83%19.46%23.96%-9.08%18.19%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between JLIAX and VTI is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2006

0.96

The correlation between JLIAX and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLIAX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLIAX
JLIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
JLIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JLIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLIAX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLIAXVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

2.33

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.23

3.18

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.17

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.06

14.62

-1.56

JLIAX vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLIAX and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLIAXVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.33

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.73

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.82

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.51

-0.10

Drawdowns

JLIAX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLIAX drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLIAX and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLIAXVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.47%

-55.45%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-8.92%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.42%

-19.30%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-25.36%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.05%

-35.00%

+3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.72%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-8.03%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.93%

0.00%

Volatility

JLIAX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that JLIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLIAXVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

2.96%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

9.13%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

12.17%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

17.40%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.15%

18.30%

-3.15%

JLIAX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLIAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLIAX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

JLIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLIAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
8.27%9.18%2.86%2.82%22.31%9.18%5.58%11.19%13.74%6.10%6.95%6.25%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, JLIAX and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JLIAX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLIAX dropped -56.47% vs VTI's -55.45%.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLIAX and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer