PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLIAX vs. PDIZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLIAX vs. PDIZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLIAX achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly higher than PDIZX's 3.96% return.


JLIAX

1D
1.66%
1M
-0.97%
6M
5.80%
YTD
9.00%
1Y
18.74%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*
9.75%
ALL TIME*
7.10%

PDIZX

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.53%
6M
2.83%
YTD
3.96%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
11.16%
5Y*
5.62%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JLIAX vs. PDIZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JLIAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
9.00%17.06%12.87%16.80%-19.86%14.83%19.46%
PDIZX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund
3.96%11.93%8.54%18.82%-14.27%12.07%11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between JLIAX and PDIZX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.94

The correlation between JLIAX and PDIZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLIAX vs. PDIZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JLIAX
JLIAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JLIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
JLIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PDIZX
PDIZX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PDIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JLIAX vs. PDIZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLIAXPDIZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.52

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

10.89

-2.47

JLIAX vs. PDIZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the PDIZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLIAX and PDIZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JLIAX vs. PDIZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLIAX drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, which is greater than PDIZX's maximum drawdown of -21.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLIAX and PDIZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLIAXPDIZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.47%

-21.03%

-35.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-3.96%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.42%

-7.31%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-18.97%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-0.88%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.74%

-4.24%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

0.92%

+1.13%

Volatility

JLIAX vs. PDIZX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX) at 1.74%. This indicates that JLIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDIZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLIAXPDIZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

1.74%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

4.78%

+5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

5.80%

+6.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

8.64%

+5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

10.39%

+4.73%

JLIAX vs. PDIZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLIAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PDIZX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLIAX vs. PDIZX - Dividend Comparison

JLIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.42%, more than PDIZX's 7.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLIAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
8.42%9.18%2.86%2.82%22.31%9.18%5.58%11.19%13.74%6.10%6.95%6.25%
PDIZX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund
7.34%7.63%4.91%3.15%7.76%12.48%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JLIAX and PDIZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JLIAX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to PDIZX (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLIAX dropped -56.47% vs PDIZX's -21.03%.

PDIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLIAX and PDIZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer