PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLGIX vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLGIX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JAG Large Cap Growth Fund (JLGIX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLGIX achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, JLGIX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 17.20%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.


JLGIX

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.00%
YTD
14.40%
6M
13.06%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
26.18%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
17.20%

QQQ

1D
-3.29%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
16.45%
6M
14.99%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
26.05%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
22.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLGIX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLGIX
JAG Large Cap Growth Fund
14.40%13.23%36.53%40.58%-30.99%15.30%40.47%21.10%0.43%34.90%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.45%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between JLGIX and QQQ is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2011

0.92

The correlation between JLGIX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLGIX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLGIX
JLGIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
JLGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
JLGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLGIX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JAG Large Cap Growth Fund (JLGIX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLGIXQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.93

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

10.86

-4.32

JLGIX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLGIX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JLGIX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLGIX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLGIX and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLGIXQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-82.97%

+44.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.73%

-11.96%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.90%

-22.77%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

-35.12%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.00%

-35.12%

-2.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-4.25%

+1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-32.73%

+25.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

3.22%

+1.17%

Volatility

JLGIX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JAG Large Cap Growth Fund (JLGIX) is 6.91%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that JLGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLGIXQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

9.17%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

14.57%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.81%

17.96%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.12%

22.69%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.59%

22.42%

+0.17%

JLGIX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLGIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLGIX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

JLGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.67%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLGIX
JAG Large Cap Growth Fund
25.67%29.37%16.00%9.48%1.57%19.56%13.06%8.82%14.57%15.31%6.07%4.46%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.43%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, JLGIX and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to JLGIX (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLGIX dropped -38.00% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLGIX and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer