JLGIX vs. MEIIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

JLGIX (JAG Large Cap Growth Fund) and MEIIX (MFS Value Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - JLGIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by JAG, while MEIIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 10 years, JLGIX returned 15.76%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for MEIIX. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JLGIX charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MEIIX.

Performance

JLGIX vs. MEIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JAG Large Cap Growth Fund (JLGIX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLGIX achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than MEIIX's 10.50% return. Over the past 10 years, JLGIX has outperformed MEIIX with an annualized return of 15.76%, while MEIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.16% annualized return.

JLGIX

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: -3.58%
• 6M: 8.02%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 1Y: 19.98%
• 3Y*: 21.84%
• 5Y*: 10.32%
• 10Y*: 15.76%
• ALL TIME*: 15.17%

MEIIX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 6.98%
• YTD: 10.50%
• 1Y: 18.81%
• 3Y*: 13.09%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: 10.16%
• ALL TIME*: 9.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JLGIX JAG Large Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

JLGIX vs. MEIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JLGIX JAG Large Cap Growth Fund	8.95%	13.23%	36.53%	40.58%	-30.99%	15.30%	40.47%	21.10%	0.43%	34.90%
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I	10.50%	13.26%	11.86%	8.21%	-6.02%	25.43%	3.99%	30.04%	-9.90%	17.20%

Correlation

The correlation between JLGIX and MEIIX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2011	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between JLGIX and MEIIX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

JLGIX vs. MEIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JLGIX

JLGIX Risk / Return Rank: 28
JLGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
JLGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
JLGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
JLGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
JLGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

MEIIX

MEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 69
MEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
MEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JLGIX vs. MEIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JAG Large Cap Growth Fund (JLGIX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JLGIX	MEIIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.55	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	2.24	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.27	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	2.42	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.88	8.50	-4.62

JLGIX vs. MEIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the MEIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLGIX and MEIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JLGIX vs. MEIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLGIX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, smaller than the maximum MEIIX drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLGIX and MEIIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLGIX	MEIIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.00%	-52.64%	+14.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.73%	-6.76%	-8.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.90%	-13.19%	-11.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.00%	-17.58%	-20.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.00%	-36.70%	-1.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.17%	-1.04%	-6.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-6.52%	-0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.65%	1.93%	+2.72%

Volatility

JLGIX vs. MEIIX - Volatility Comparison

JAG Large Cap Growth Fund (JLGIX) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) at 2.76%. This indicates that JLGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLGIX	MEIIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	2.76%	+3.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.01%	7.49%	+8.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.75%	10.58%	+9.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.28%	13.89%	+8.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.61%	16.48%	+6.13%

JLGIX vs. MEIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLGIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIIX's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

JLGIX vs. MEIIX - Dividend Comparison

JLGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.96%, more than MEIIX's 8.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JLGIX JAG Large Cap Growth Fund	26.96%	29.37%	16.00%	9.48%	1.57%	19.56%	13.06%	8.82%	14.57%	15.31%	6.07%	4.46%
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I	8.76%	9.52%	9.30%	8.41%	7.58%	3.32%	2.63%	3.17%	3.62%	4.04%	2.91%	5.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLGIX and MEIIX in my portfolio?

JLGIX and MEIIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JLGIX or MEIIX?

JLGIX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to MEIIX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLGIX dropped -38.00% vs MEIIX's -52.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MEIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.