JILGX vs. PDT
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JILGX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT).
JILGX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 13, 2005. PDT is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 14, 1989.
Performance
JILGX vs. PDT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JILGX vs. PDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILGX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio | -3.50% | 4.24% | 11.94% | 16.22% | -17.44% | 14.29% | 17.61% | 22.27% | -8.28% | 15.94% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 5.12% | 7.64% | 29.92% | -9.55% | -16.30% | 25.98% | -14.20% | 39.29% | -12.49% | 21.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JILGX achieves a -3.50% return, which is significantly lower than PDT's 5.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JILGX having a 7.34% annualized return and PDT not far behind at 7.10%.
JILGX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- -3.50%
- 6M
- -11.25%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
PDT
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 8.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JILGX vs. PDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
JILGX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than PDT's 5.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JILGX vs. PDT — Risk / Return Rank
JILGX
PDT
JILGX vs. PDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JILGX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JILGX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 0.61 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.15 | 0.87 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.14 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.84 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | 3.30 | -3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JILGX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 0.61 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.33 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.28 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.32 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between JILGX and PDT is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JILGX vs. PDT - Dividend Comparison
JILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than PDT's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILGX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio | 2.47% | 2.38% | 2.94% | 6.20% | 14.58% | 10.72% | 6.35% | 12.46% | 11.94% | 6.15% | 7.98% | 8.76% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 7.56% | 7.80% | 7.77% | 10.14% | 9.04% | 6.42% | 8.43% | 6.70% | 8.69% | 9.94% | 9.15% | 7.88% |
Drawdowns
JILGX vs. PDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JILGX drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, smaller than the maximum PDT drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILGX and PDT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JILGX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.66% | -62.39% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | -10.34% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | -40.44% | +15.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.58% | -62.39% | +32.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.01% | -2.93% | -11.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -10.06% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 2.67% | +2.81% |
Volatility
JILGX vs. PDT - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JILGX) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) at 4.21%. This indicates that JILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JILGX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 4.21% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 7.16% | +6.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 13.21% | +5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 17.06% | -2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 25.18% | -10.81% |