JILCX vs. AAAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX).
JILCX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 13, 2005. AAAAX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 30, 2007.
Performance
JILCX vs. AAAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JILCX vs. AAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | -1.22% | 9.33% | 6.12% | 9.17% | -11.73% | 3.55% | 9.85% | 12.00% | -3.33% | 6.12% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 9.77% | 12.82% | 5.24% | 2.30% | -9.91% | 23.45% | 3.71% | 21.42% | -5.36% | 14.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JILCX achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly lower than AAAAX's 9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, JILCX has underperformed AAAAX with an annualized return of 4.12%, while AAAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.40% annualized return.
JILCX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 6.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.56%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
AAAAX
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 17.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JILCX vs. AAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JILCX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JILCX vs. AAAAX — Risk / Return Rank
JILCX
AAAAX
JILCX vs. AAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JILCX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 1.57 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 2.11 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 1.91 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | 10.22 | -3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JILCX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.57 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.56 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.59 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.38 | +0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between JILCX and AAAAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JILCX vs. AAAAX - Dividend Comparison
JILCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than AAAAX's 3.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | 3.41% | 4.15% | 4.17% | 3.89% | 6.79% | 6.25% | 4.53% | 4.01% | 4.39% | 2.44% | 4.26% | 5.65% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 3.23% | 3.54% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 4.17% | 2.31% | 1.33% | 1.81% | 1.61% | 1.52% | 1.47% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
JILCX vs. AAAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JILCX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, smaller than the maximum AAAAX drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILCX and AAAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JILCX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.90% | -40.47% | +17.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.06% | -9.55% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.51% | -22.62% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.51% | -29.41% | +12.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -3.53% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -6.89% | +4.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 1.79% | -0.74% |
Volatility
JILCX vs. AAAAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) is 1.45%, while DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that JILCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JILCX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | 3.27% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.92% | 7.26% | -4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.52% | 11.62% | -6.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 12.19% | -6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.02% | 12.66% | -7.64% |