JILBX vs. SMIFX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JILBX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio) and SMIFX (Sound Mind Investing Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, JILBX returned 7.25%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for SMIFX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JILBX charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for SMIFX.

Performance

JILBX vs. SMIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio (JILBX) and Sound Mind Investing Fund (SMIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JILBX achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than SMIFX's 16.98% return. Over the past 10 years, JILBX has underperformed SMIFX with an annualized return of 7.25%, while SMIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.48% annualized return.

JILBX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 8.84%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 10.35%
• 3Y*: 10.63%
• 5Y*: 4.29%
• 10Y*: 7.25%

SMIFX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 16.98%
• 6M: 16.53%
• 1Y: 20.67%
• 3Y*: 13.24%
• 5Y*: 5.90%
• 10Y*: 9.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JILBX vs. SMIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JILBX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio	8.84%	5.24%	9.69%	13.90%	-16.11%	11.50%	15.34%	19.07%	-6.48%	12.83%
SMIFX Sound Mind Investing Fund	16.98%	3.16%	16.65%	5.17%	-8.93%	11.15%	20.76%	19.28%	-8.56%	17.49%

Correlation

The correlation between JILBX and SMIFX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2005	0.90

The correlation between JILBX and SMIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JILBX vs. SMIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JILBX

JILBX Risk / Return Rank: 14
JILBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
JILBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
JILBX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
JILBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
JILBX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

SMIFX

SMIFX Risk / Return Rank: 42
SMIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SMIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SMIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SMIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SMIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JILBX vs. SMIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio (JILBX) and Sound Mind Investing Fund (SMIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JILBX	SMIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	1.76	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	2.42	-1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.31	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	2.75	-1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.03	8.82	-5.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JILBX vs. SMIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JILBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the SMIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JILBX and SMIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JILBX	SMIFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	1.76	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.20	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.39	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.32	+0.24

Drawdowns

JILBX vs. SMIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JILBX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum SMIFX drawdown of -54.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILBX and SMIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JILBX	SMIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.80%	-54.33%	+12.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.55%	-7.42%	-3.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.92%	-19.98%	+9.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.75%	-41.36%	+18.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.02%	-41.36%	+16.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-8.66%	+8.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-14.28%	+9.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	2.31%	+1.32%

Volatility

JILBX vs. SMIFX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio (JILBX) and Sound Mind Investing Fund (SMIFX) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JILBX	SMIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.96%	2.90%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.61%	8.89%	+1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.97%	11.61%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.21%	29.03%	-17.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.12%	24.17%	-13.05%

JILBX vs. SMIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JILBX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SMIFX's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

JILBX vs. SMIFX - Dividend Comparison

JILBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than SMIFX's 4.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JILBX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio	2.39%	2.98%	2.91%	5.21%	12.31%	10.60%	5.96%	9.47%	9.62%	5.83%	7.04%	7.49%
SMIFX Sound Mind Investing Fund	4.56%	5.33%	1.28%	1.73%	0.97%	46.86%	0.00%	0.48%	26.02%	10.06%	0.00%	14.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JILBX and SMIFX in my portfolio?

JILBX and SMIFX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JILBX or SMIFX?

JILBX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to SMIFX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JILBX dropped -41.80% vs SMIFX's -54.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.