SMIFX vs. BAGPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SMIFX (Sound Mind Investing Fund) and BAGPX (BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Investor A Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, SMIFX returned 9.47%/yr vs 8.19%/yr for BAGPX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMIFX charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BAGPX.

Performance

SMIFX vs. BAGPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sound Mind Investing Fund (SMIFX) and BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Investor A Shares (BAGPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIFX achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly higher than BAGPX's 10.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SMIFX has outperformed BAGPX with an annualized return of 9.47%, while BAGPX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.19% annualized return.

SMIFX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 15.94%
• 6M: 15.05%
• 1Y: 21.32%
• 3Y*: 12.51%
• 5Y*: 6.77%
• 10Y*: 9.47%

BAGPX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 10.00%
• 6M: 9.78%
• 1Y: 22.25%
• 3Y*: 11.22%
• 5Y*: 5.81%
• 10Y*: 8.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMIFX vs. BAGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMIFX Sound Mind Investing Fund	15.94%	3.16%	16.65%	5.17%	-8.93%	11.15%	20.76%	19.28%	-8.56%	17.49%
BAGPX BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Investor A Shares	10.00%	15.67%	2.29%	15.54%	-16.08%	7.33%	20.85%	20.62%	-6.19%	14.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SMIFX and BAGPX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2006	0.90

The correlation between SMIFX and BAGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SMIFX vs. BAGPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIFX

SMIFX Risk / Return Rank: 45
SMIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
SMIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SMIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SMIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SMIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

BAGPX

BAGPX Risk / Return Rank: 72
BAGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
BAGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
BAGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
BAGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BAGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIFX vs. BAGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sound Mind Investing Fund (SMIFX) and BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Investor A Shares (BAGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMIFX	BAGPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	2.28	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	3.23	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.43	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	3.02	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.12	13.33	-4.20

SMIFX vs. BAGPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the BAGPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIFX and BAGPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMIFX vs. BAGPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIFX drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, which is greater than BAGPX's maximum drawdown of -47.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIFX and BAGPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMIFX	BAGPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.33%	-47.25%	-7.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.42%	-7.33%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.98%	-17.99%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.36%	-22.07%	-19.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.36%	-22.37%	-18.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.47%	-0.06%	-9.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.27%	-6.47%	-7.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	1.65%	+0.69%

Volatility

SMIFX vs. BAGPX - Volatility Comparison

Sound Mind Investing Fund (SMIFX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Investor A Shares (BAGPX) at 4.16%. This indicates that SMIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMIFX	BAGPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	4.16%	+1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.99%	8.48%	+1.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.44%	9.72%	+2.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.07%	11.97%	+17.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.21%	11.35%	+12.86%

SMIFX vs. BAGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIFX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BAGPX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMIFX vs. BAGPX - Dividend Comparison

SMIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than BAGPX's 7.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAGPX BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Investor A Shares	7.12%	7.83%	0.00%	2.75%	2.28%	7.40%	3.54%	3.50%	7.13%	2.91%	1.55%	9.78%
SMIFX Sound Mind Investing Fund	4.60%	5.33%	1.28%	1.73%	0.97%	46.86%	0.00%	0.48%	26.02%	10.06%	0.00%	14.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMIFX and BAGPX in my portfolio?

SMIFX and BAGPX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMIFX or BAGPX?

SMIFX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to BAGPX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIFX dropped -54.33% vs BAGPX's -47.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAGPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.