JILBX vs. JFIVX

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

JILBX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio) and JFIVX (John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust) are both mutual funds - JILBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by John Hancock, while JFIVX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 5 years, JILBX returned 3.99%/yr vs 12.74%/yr for JFIVX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JILBX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JFIVX.

Performance

JILBX vs. JFIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio (JILBX) and John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust (JFIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JILBX achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than JFIVX's 9.79% return.

JILBX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.30%
• 6M: 7.66%
• YTD: 8.22%
• 1Y: 6.46%
• 3Y*: 9.57%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: 7.24%

JFIVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.86%
• 6M: 9.57%
• YTD: 9.79%
• 1Y: 20.25%
• 3Y*: 20.11%
• 5Y*: 12.74%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JILBX vs. JFIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JILBX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio	8.22%	5.24%	9.69%	13.90%	-16.11%	11.50%	15.34%	19.07%	-6.48%	10.66%
JFIVX John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust	9.79%	17.54%	24.61%	25.92%	-18.30%	28.31%	18.03%	31.05%	-5.00%	17.27%

Correlation

The correlation between JILBX and JFIVX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017	0.89

The correlation between JILBX and JFIVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (3 years) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JILBX vs. JFIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JILBX

JILBX Risk / Return Rank: 10
JILBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
JILBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
JILBX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
JILBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
JILBX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

JFIVX

JFIVX Risk / Return Rank: 63
JFIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
JFIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
JFIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
JFIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
JFIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JILBX vs. JFIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio (JILBX) and John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust (JFIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JILBX	JFIVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	1.76	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	2.42	-1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.32	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	2.49	-1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.96	10.92	-8.96

JILBX vs. JFIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JILBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the JFIVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JILBX and JFIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JILBX vs. JFIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JILBX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, which is greater than JFIVX's maximum drawdown of -33.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILBX and JFIVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JILBX	JFIVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.80%	-33.81%	-7.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.55%	-8.94%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.92%	-18.82%	+7.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.75%	-24.67%	+1.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	-1.58%	+0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.06%	-4.60%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.65%	2.02%	+1.63%

Volatility

JILBX vs. JFIVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio (JILBX) is 4.26%, while John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust (JFIVX) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that JILBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JFIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JILBX	JFIVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	5.00%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.18%	9.92%	-1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.55%	12.62%	-0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.36%	16.66%	-5.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.12%	18.32%	-7.20%

JILBX vs. JFIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JILBX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JFIVX's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

JILBX vs. JFIVX - Dividend Comparison

JILBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than JFIVX's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JFIVX John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust	2.33%	2.56%	2.19%	2.44%	5.19%	5.17%	3.38%	2.97%	2.90%	1.27%	0.00%	0.00%
JILBX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio	2.46%	2.98%	2.91%	5.21%	12.31%	10.60%	5.96%	9.47%	9.62%	5.83%	7.04%	7.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JILBX and JFIVX in my portfolio?

JILBX and JFIVX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JILBX or JFIVX?

JFIVX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to JILBX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JILBX dropped -41.80% vs JFIVX's -33.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JFIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.