JIGMX vs. TAGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX).
JIGMX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Apr 27, 2015. TAGRX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 1, 1984.
Performance
JIGMX vs. TAGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JIGMX vs. TAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIGMX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 | -0.55% | 7.50% | 1.36% | 4.55% | -14.64% | -1.49% | 9.76% | 8.71% | -0.19% | 3.91% |
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | -8.29% | 9.98% | 21.14% | 32.23% | -24.86% | 29.16% | 20.55% | 35.06% | -14.09% | 19.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JIGMX achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly higher than TAGRX's -8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, JIGMX has underperformed TAGRX with an annualized return of 1.72%, while TAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.59% annualized return.
JIGMX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.11%
- 5Y*
- -0.37%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
TAGRX
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- YTD
- -8.29%
- 6M
- -6.58%
- 1Y
- 7.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JIGMX vs. TAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JIGMX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than TAGRX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JIGMX vs. TAGRX — Risk / Return Rank
JIGMX
TAGRX
JIGMX vs. TAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JIGMX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 0.40 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 0.70 | +0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.10 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 0.56 | +0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | 1.91 | +2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JIGMX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.40 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.36 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.57 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.46 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between JIGMX and TAGRX is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
JIGMX vs. TAGRX - Dividend Comparison
JIGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than TAGRX's 13.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIGMX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 | 3.80% | 4.10% | 3.82% | 2.43% | 2.57% | 2.34% | 4.61% | 2.92% | 2.92% | 2.77% | 2.83% | 0.00% |
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | 13.18% | 12.09% | 13.00% | 6.67% | 6.76% | 7.82% | 0.30% | 0.53% | 14.05% | 8.22% | 2.96% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
JIGMX vs. TAGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JIGMX drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, smaller than the maximum TAGRX drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGMX and TAGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JIGMX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.82% | -58.45% | +38.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -14.04% | +10.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.82% | -29.10% | +9.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.82% | -36.96% | +17.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | -11.64% | +6.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -11.57% | +6.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 4.13% | -3.04% |
Volatility
JIGMX vs. TAGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) is 1.57%, while John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that JIGMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JIGMX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 5.19% | -3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 10.11% | -7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.58% | 18.91% | -14.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 20.21% | -14.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.95% | 20.50% | -15.55% |