JIGMX vs. JHNBX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JIGMX (John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4) and JHNBX (John Hancock Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - JIGMX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by John Hancock, while JHNBX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JIGMX returned 1.66%/yr vs 2.21%/yr for JHNBX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JIGMX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for JHNBX.

Performance

JIGMX vs. JHNBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIGMX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than JHNBX's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, JIGMX has underperformed JHNBX with an annualized return of 1.66%, while JHNBX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.21% annualized return.

JIGMX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: 0.14%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 5.13%
• 3Y*: 3.70%
• 5Y*: -0.45%
• 10Y*: 1.66%

JHNBX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 0.77%
• 1Y: 5.47%
• 3Y*: 4.48%
• 5Y*: 0.02%
• 10Y*: 2.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIGMX vs. JHNBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JIGMX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4	0.14%	7.50%	1.36%	4.55%	-14.64%	-1.49%	9.76%	8.71%	-0.19%	3.91%
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund	0.32%	7.53%	1.97%	6.24%	-15.22%	-0.68%	10.31%	10.09%	-1.15%	4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JIGMX and JHNBX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.96

The correlation between JIGMX and JHNBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JIGMX vs. JHNBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIGMX

JIGMX Risk / Return Rank: 19
JIGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
JIGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
JIGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
JIGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
JIGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

JHNBX

JHNBX Risk / Return Rank: 22
JHNBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
JHNBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
JHNBX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
JHNBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
JHNBX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIGMX vs. JHNBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JIGMX	JHNBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.33	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	1.97	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.23	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	1.62	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.42	4.93	-0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JIGMX vs. JHNBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the JHNBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIGMX and JHNBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JIGMX	JHNBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	1.33	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	0.00	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.45	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.75	-0.36

Drawdowns

JIGMX vs. JHNBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIGMX drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, smaller than the maximum JHNBX drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGMX and JHNBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JIGMX	JHNBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.82%	-24.74%	+4.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.31%	-3.25%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.17%	-6.69%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.82%	-20.13%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.82%	-20.13%	+0.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.15%	-2.07%	-2.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.18%	-4.15%	-1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	1.07%	+0.04%

Volatility

JIGMX vs. JHNBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) is 1.31%, while John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that JIGMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHNBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JIGMX	JHNBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.31%	1.38%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.89%	2.91%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.07%	3.99%	+0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.04%	5.87%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.97%	4.91%	+0.06%

JIGMX vs. JHNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIGMX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than JHNBX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

JIGMX vs. JHNBX - Dividend Comparison

JIGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than JHNBX's 4.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund	4.48%	4.41%	4.14%	3.80%	2.93%	3.30%	5.50%	3.75%	3.51%	3.23%	3.19%	3.48%
JIGMX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4	4.16%	4.10%	3.82%	2.43%	2.57%	2.34%	4.61%	2.92%	2.92%	2.77%	2.83%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JIGMX and JHNBX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, JIGMX and JHNBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JIGMX or JHNBX?

JHNBX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to JIGMX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIGMX dropped -19.82% vs JHNBX's -24.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHNBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.