PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIGMX vs. JCCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIGMX vs. JCCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) and John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIGMX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than JCCIX's 18.29% return. Over the past 10 years, JIGMX has underperformed JCCIX with an annualized return of 1.66%, while JCCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.32% annualized return.


JIGMX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.39%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
-0.45%
10Y*
1.66%

JCCIX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.69%
YTD
18.29%
6M
17.69%
1Y
26.50%
3Y*
12.81%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
10.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIGMX vs. JCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIGMX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4
0.14%7.50%1.36%4.55%-14.64%-1.49%9.76%8.71%-0.19%3.91%
JCCIX
John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund
18.29%-1.90%10.62%16.52%-19.09%24.10%25.99%26.79%-18.28%16.04%

Correlation

The correlation between JIGMX and JCCIX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

-0.02

The correlation between JIGMX and JCCIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIGMX vs. JCCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIGMX
JIGMX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
JIGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
JIGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

JCCIX
JCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
JCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
JCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIGMX vs. JCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) and John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIGMXJCCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

2.56

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

8.13

-3.71

JIGMX vs. JCCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the JCCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIGMX and JCCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIGMXJCCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.44

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.20

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.48

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.43

-0.03

Drawdowns

JIGMX vs. JCCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIGMX drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, smaller than the maximum JCCIX drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGMX and JCCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIGMXJCCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-38.69%

+18.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-10.42%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.17%

-27.47%

+20.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

-27.47%

+7.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.82%

-38.69%

+18.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.15%

-0.78%

-3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-7.60%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

3.27%

-2.16%

Volatility

JIGMX vs. JCCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) is 1.31%, while John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that JIGMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIGMXJCCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

5.14%

-3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

12.87%

-9.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

18.43%

-14.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

21.61%

-15.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

21.48%

-16.51%

JIGMX vs. JCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIGMX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than JCCIX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIGMX vs. JCCIX - Dividend Comparison

JIGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than JCCIX's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JCCIX
John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund
3.83%4.53%0.96%0.83%0.99%12.20%1.43%0.00%5.55%11.90%0.73%1.07%
JIGMX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4
4.16%4.10%3.82%2.43%2.57%2.34%4.61%2.92%2.92%2.77%2.83%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIGMX and JCCIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JCCIX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to JIGMX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIGMX dropped -19.82% vs JCCIX's -38.69%.

JCCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIGMX and JCCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer