JIG vs. PJFG

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JIG (JPMorgan International Growth ETF) and PJFG (PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JIG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while PJFG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JIG returned 13.39%/yr vs 22.64%/yr for PJFG. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JIG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PJFG.

Performance

JIG vs. PJFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIG achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than PJFG's 3.23% return.

JIG

• 1D: -4.83%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 6M: 11.00%
• 1Y: 18.94%
• 3Y*: 13.39%
• 5Y*: 2.66%
• 10Y*: —

PJFG

• 1D: -3.46%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 3.23%
• 6M: 2.24%
• 1Y: 16.02%
• 3Y*: 22.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIG vs. PJFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JIG JPMorgan International Growth ETF	10.73%	20.10%	8.84%	13.00%	-4.42%
PJFG PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF	3.23%	16.94%	31.59%	54.23%	-6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JIG and PJFG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022	0.72

The correlation between JIG and PJFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

JIG vs. PJFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JIG	PJFG
Technology	23.0%	48.4%
Industrials	18.6%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	12.6%
Financial Services	7.0%	3.4%
Basic Materials	3.8%	-
Healthcare	3.1%	6.0%
Communication Services	2.7%	20.2%
Utilities	2.6%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	3.0%
Energy	0.7%	-
Real Estate	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

JIG vs. PJFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIG

JIG Risk / Return Rank: 31
JIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
JIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
JIG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
JIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
JIG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

PJFG

PJFG Risk / Return Rank: 25
PJFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
PJFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
PJFG Omega Ratio Rank: 27
PJFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
PJFG Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIG vs. PJFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JIG	PJFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.94	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	1.35	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.17	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	0.85	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.55	2.65	+2.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JIG vs. PJFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the PJFG Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIG and PJFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JIG	PJFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	0.94	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	1.29	-0.81

Drawdowns

JIG vs. PJFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIG drawdown since its inception was -43.75%, which is greater than PJFG's maximum drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIG and PJFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	JIG	PJFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.75%	-24.24%	-19.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.94%	-19.00%	+6.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.04%	-24.24%	+8.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.48%	-5.29%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.77%	-3.75%	-13.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	6.05%	-2.63%

Volatility

JIG vs. PJFG - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) at 5.40%. This indicates that JIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JIG	PJFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.13%	5.40%	+2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.88%	13.36%	+3.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.13%	17.19%	+1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.06%	20.94%	-1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.13%	20.94%	-1.81%

JIG vs. PJFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

JIG vs. PJFG - Dividend Comparison

JIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while PJFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JIG JPMorgan International Growth ETF	2.03%	2.25%	1.70%	1.69%	0.91%	1.35%	0.04%
PJFG PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JIG and PJFG in my portfolio?

JIG and PJFG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JIG or PJFG?

JIG has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to PJFG (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIG dropped -43.75% vs PJFG's -24.24%.

Which ETF is better, JIG or PJFG?

On 3-year performance, PJFG leads with 22.64% vs 13.39% for JIG. On fees, JIG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PJFG has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JIG or PJFG?

Over the 3-year period, PJFG has performed better with a 22.64% return vs 13.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JIG or PJFG?

JIG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JIG or PJFG?

JIG has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.00% for PJFG.

What is the main difference between JIG and PJFG?

JIG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PJFG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for JIG and 0.75% for PJFG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.