PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIEHX vs. SSDJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIEHX vs. SSDJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX) and State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund (SSDJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIEHX achieves a 12.46% return, which is significantly higher than SSDJX's 11.24% return.


JIEHX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.96%
YTD
12.46%
6M
11.70%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*

SSDJX

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.79%
YTD
11.24%
6M
10.53%
1Y
25.64%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
11.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIEHX vs. SSDJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIEHX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
12.46%20.12%15.37%18.47%-18.03%18.48%16.08%25.00%-8.22%16.82%
SSDJX
State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund
11.24%20.71%12.35%19.18%-19.24%13.12%19.69%25.73%-8.12%18.90%

Correlation

The correlation between JIEHX and SSDJX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.97

The correlation between JIEHX and SSDJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIEHX vs. SSDJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIEHX
JIEHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JIEHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIEHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIEHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JIEHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIEHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SSDJX
SSDJX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SSDJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSDJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSDJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SSDJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSDJX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIEHX vs. SSDJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX) and State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund (SSDJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIEHXSSDJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.03

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.59

12.67

+0.92

JIEHX vs. SSDJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIEHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the SSDJX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIEHX and SSDJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIEHX vs. SSDJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIEHX drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, which is greater than SSDJX's maximum drawdown of -29.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIEHX and SSDJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIEHXSSDJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-29.95%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-8.73%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.15%

-14.70%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.70%

-27.45%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.37%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-5.03%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.08%

+0.03%

Volatility

JIEHX vs. SSDJX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund (SSDJX) at 4.61%. This indicates that JIEHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSDJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIEHXSSDJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

4.61%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

9.62%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

11.64%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

14.23%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

14.81%

+1.66%

JIEHX vs. SSDJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIEHX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SSDJX's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JIEHX vs. SSDJX - Dividend Comparison

JIEHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than SSDJX's 5.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIEHX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
3.15%3.55%1.76%2.17%6.57%5.15%3.18%6.88%6.99%1.76%0.00%0.00%
SSDJX
State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund
5.44%6.05%4.63%3.13%5.47%4.87%4.13%6.79%5.05%0.45%1.73%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JIEHX and SSDJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JIEHX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to SSDJX (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIEHX dropped -32.55% vs SSDJX's -29.95%.

SSDJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIEHX and SSDJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer