PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIEHX vs. LPWRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIEHX vs. LPWRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIEHX achieves a 12.41% return, which is significantly lower than LPWRX's 13.32% return.


JIEHX

1D
0.34%
1M
4.59%
YTD
12.41%
6M
13.66%
1Y
28.94%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*

LPWRX

1D
0.47%
1M
4.60%
YTD
13.32%
6M
14.75%
1Y
29.08%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIEHX vs. LPWRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JIEHX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
12.41%20.12%15.37%18.47%-18.03%18.48%16.08%5.26%
LPWRX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund
13.32%20.43%8.99%22.14%-18.94%17.84%13.47%5.28%

Correlation

The correlation between JIEHX and LPWRX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019

0.96

The correlation between JIEHX and LPWRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIEHX vs. LPWRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIEHX
JIEHX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JIEHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIEHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIEHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JIEHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIEHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

LPWRX
LPWRX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LPWRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPWRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPWRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
LPWRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPWRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIEHX vs. LPWRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIEHXLPWRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

2.14

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.39

2.96

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.38

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.00

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.29

13.14

+1.15

JIEHX vs. LPWRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIEHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the LPWRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIEHX and LPWRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIEHXLPWRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.14

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.54

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.63

+0.07

Drawdowns

JIEHX vs. LPWRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIEHX drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, roughly equal to the maximum LPWRX drawdown of -33.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIEHX and LPWRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIEHXLPWRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-33.27%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-10.07%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.15%

-21.36%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.70%

-27.28%

+1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-6.45%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.30%

-0.24%

Volatility

JIEHX vs. LPWRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX) is 3.52%, while BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that JIEHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LPWRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIEHXLPWRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

4.16%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

11.41%

-1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

14.24%

-2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

16.96%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.45%

18.60%

-2.15%

JIEHX vs. LPWRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIEHX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than LPWRX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIEHX vs. LPWRX - Dividend Comparison

JIEHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than LPWRX's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIEHX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
3.16%3.55%1.76%2.17%6.57%5.15%3.18%6.88%6.99%1.76%
LPWRX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund
2.00%2.26%1.00%2.07%2.35%9.34%1.00%0.55%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, JIEHX and LPWRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LPWRX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to JIEHX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIEHX dropped -32.55% vs LPWRX's -33.27%.

JIEHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIEHX and LPWRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer