PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSDJX vs. VTTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSDJX vs. VTTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund (SSDJX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VTTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSDJX achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than VTTSX's 12.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SSDJX has underperformed VTTSX with an annualized return of 11.02%, while VTTSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.


SSDJX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.98%
YTD
11.12%
6M
12.28%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
11.02%

VTTSX

1D
0.35%
1M
5.18%
YTD
12.17%
6M
13.10%
1Y
28.27%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSDJX vs. VTTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSDJX
State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund
11.12%20.71%12.35%19.18%-19.24%13.12%19.69%25.73%-8.12%18.90%
VTTSX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund
12.17%21.43%14.61%20.19%-17.48%16.45%16.33%26.18%-8.78%21.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SSDJX and VTTSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.98

The correlation between SSDJX and VTTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSDJX vs. VTTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSDJX
SSDJX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SSDJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSDJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSDJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SSDJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSDJX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VTTSX
VTTSX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VTTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSDJX vs. VTTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund (SSDJX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VTTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSDJXVTTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

2.51

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

3.46

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.46

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.21

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.39

14.23

-0.84

SSDJX vs. VTTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSDJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the VTTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSDJX and VTTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSDJXVTTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.51

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.74

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.79

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.79

-0.11

Drawdowns

SSDJX vs. VTTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSDJX drawdown since its inception was -29.95%, roughly equal to the maximum VTTSX drawdown of -31.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSDJX and VTTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSDJXVTTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.95%

-31.38%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-8.93%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.70%

-14.51%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.45%

-25.40%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.95%

-31.38%

+1.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-4.04%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.01%

+0.03%

Volatility

SSDJX vs. VTTSX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund (SSDJX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VTTSX) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSDJXVTTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.36%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

9.08%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

11.42%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

14.18%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.77%

15.10%

-0.33%

SSDJX vs. VTTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSDJX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VTTSX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSDJX vs. VTTSX - Dividend Comparison

SSDJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than VTTSX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSDJX
State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund
5.45%6.05%4.63%3.13%5.47%4.87%4.13%6.79%5.05%0.45%1.73%1.86%
VTTSX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund
1.83%2.06%2.20%2.14%2.09%5.67%1.83%2.11%2.33%1.77%1.98%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SSDJX and VTTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTTSX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to SSDJX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSDJX dropped -29.95% vs VTTSX's -31.38%.

SSDJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSDJX and VTTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer